These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31249804)

  • 61. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
    Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia.
    Murphy J; Vaughn J; Gelber K; Geller A; Zakowski M
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2019 Aug; 39():82-87. PubMed ID: 31000314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Related to Parathyroid Surgery.
    Patel CR; Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2015 Jul; 124(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 25593212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of online disaster and emergency preparedness resources.
    Friedman DB; Tanwar M; Richter JV
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2008; 23(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 19189613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases.
    Rhee RL; Von Feldt JM; Schumacher HR; Merkel PA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2013 Oct; 65(10):1702-6. PubMed ID: 23687011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
    Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
    Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable?
    Boulos MN
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Jun; 7(3):528-35. PubMed ID: 15929685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
    Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials.
    Patel CR; Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Head Neck; 2013 Oct; 35(10):1421-5. PubMed ID: 22972634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
    Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
    Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
    Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A
    J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Systematic review of online patient resources to support shared decision making for bariatric surgery.
    Musbahi A; Brown LR; Reddy A; Viswanath YKS; Rao M; Gopinath BR
    Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():34-38. PubMed ID: 31883844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The Readability of Online Patient Information About Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
    Vargas CR; DePry J; Lee BT; Bordeaux JS
    Dermatol Surg; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27598447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR.
    McEnteggart GE; Naeem M; Skierkowski D; Baird GL; Ahn SH; Soares G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1164-8. PubMed ID: 25935147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.