195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31249868)
1. Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.
Fujisawa T; Sasabe M; Nagata N; Takami Y; Sota T
Sci Adv; 2019 Jun; 5(6):eaav9939. PubMed ID: 31249868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive Character Displacement in Genital Morphology in
Nishimura T; Nagata N; Terada K; Xia T; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):E76-E90. PubMed ID: 35175894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Sex-Concordant Gene Expression in the Coevolution of Exaggerated Male and Female Genitalia in a Beetle Group.
Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 38(9):3593-3605. PubMed ID: 33905498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5231-9. PubMed ID: 21040054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles.
Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 17327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterochrony and growth rate variation mediate the development of divergent genital morphologies in closely related Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Terada K; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
Evol Dev; 2021 Jan; 23(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 33245198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of two closely related ground beetle species with marked genital divergence using pyrosequencing.
Fujimaki K; Fujisawa T; Yazawa S; Nishimura O; Sota T
Zoolog Sci; 2014 Sep; 31(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25186930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolutionary changes in gene expression profiles associated with the coevolution of male and female genital parts among closely related ground beetle species.
Nomura S; Sota T
BMC Genomics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):637. PubMed ID: 36076166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology due to cascade reinforcement in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Xia T; Nishimura T; Nagata N; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):169-182. PubMed ID: 36357996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of relative trait size and shape: insights from the genitalia of dung beetles.
Parzer HF; David Polly P; Moczek AP
Dev Genes Evol; 2018 Mar; 228(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 29423654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology.
Simmons LW; Garcia-Gonzalez F
Nat Commun; 2011 Jul; 2():374. PubMed ID: 21730955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diversification in a fluctuating island setting: rapid radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles in the Japanese Islands.
Sota T; Nagata N
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Oct; 363(1508):3377-90. PubMed ID: 18765360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of sexually antagonistic genital morphologies on female reproduction and wild population demography.
Takami Y; Fukuhara T; Yokoyama J; Kawata M
Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2449-2461. PubMed ID: 30238547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Both male and female novel traits promote the correlated evolution of genitalia between the sexes in an arthropod.
Tanabe T; Sota T
Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):441-52. PubMed ID: 24116383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
Peluffo AE; Nuez I; Debat V; Savisaar R; Stern DL; Orgogozo V
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2893-901. PubMed ID: 26511499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection on an antagonistic behavioral trait can drive rapid genital coevolution in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
Hopwood PE; Head ML; Jordan EJ; Carter MJ; Davey E; Moore AJ; Royle NJ
Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1180-8. PubMed ID: 27144373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape--but not size--codivergence between male and female copulatory structures in Onthophagus beetles.
Macagno AL; Pizzo A; Parzer HF; Palestrini C; Rolando A; Moczek AP
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28893. PubMed ID: 22194942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divergence in the internal genital morphology of females and correlated divergence in male intromittent structures among populations of a millipede.
Sloan NS; Kennington WJ; Simmons LW
Evolution; 2023 Nov; 77(11):2456-2471. PubMed ID: 37658784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female-driven intersexual coevolution in beetle genitalia.
Genevcius BC; Baker J; Bianchi FM; Marvaldi AE
J Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):957-965. PubMed ID: 32277841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
