258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31251780)
1. Biomechanical study of the fixation stability of broken pedicle screws and subsequent strategies.
Hsieh MK; Liu MY; Chen JK; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Niu CC; Tai CL
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0219189. PubMed ID: 31251780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of longer sized screws is a salvage method for broken pedicles in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Hsieh MK; Liu MY; Chen JK; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Niu CC; Tai CL
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10441. PubMed ID: 32591573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting pullout strength of pedicle screws in broken bones from X-ray images.
Tsai YY; Hsieh MK; Lai PL; Tai CL; Chang SW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105366. PubMed ID: 35870229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.
Pfeiffer M; Gilbertson LG; Goel VK; Griss P; Keller JC; Ryken TC; Hoffman HE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 8724087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.
Lai DM; Shih YT; Chen YH; Chien A; Wang JL
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():196-203. PubMed ID: 29126607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method.
Renner SM; Lim TH; Kim WJ; Katolik L; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):E212-6. PubMed ID: 15167670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.
Abshire BB; McLain RF; Valdevit A; Kambic HE
Spine J; 2001; 1(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 14588297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts.
Jia C; Zhang R; Xing T; Gao H; Li H; Dong F; Zhang J; Ge P; Song P; Xu P; Zhang H; Shen C
Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 31009768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study.
Liu D; Zhang B; Xie QY; Kang X; Zhou JJ; Wang CR; Lei W; Zheng W
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Derinçek A; Türker M; Cinar M; Cetik O; Kalaycioğlu B
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
