201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31252430)
21. Structure reveals why genome folding is necessary for site-specific integration of foreign DNA into CRISPR arrays.
Santiago-Frangos A; Henriques WS; Wiegand T; Gauvin CC; Buyukyoruk M; Graham AB; Wilkinson RA; Triem L; Neselu K; Eng ET; Lander GC; Wiedenheft B
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2023 Nov; 30(11):1675-1685. PubMed ID: 37710013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CRISPR-Cas adaptation in Escherichia coli.
Mitić D; Bolt EL; Ivančić-Baće I
Biosci Rep; 2023 Mar; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 36809461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CRISPR repeat sequences and relative spacing specify DNA integration by Pyrococcus furiosus Cas1 and Cas2.
Grainy J; Garrett S; Graveley BR; P Terns M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Aug; 47(14):7518-7531. PubMed ID: 31219587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CRISPR adaptation in Escherichia coli subtypeI-E system.
Kiro R; Goren MG; Yosef I; Qimron U
Biochem Soc Trans; 2013 Dec; 41(6):1412-5. PubMed ID: 24256229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Functional Mini-Integrase in a Two-Protein-type V-C CRISPR System.
Wright AV; Wang JY; Burstein D; Harrington LB; Paez-Espino D; Kyrpides NC; Iavarone AT; Banfield JF; Doudna JA
Mol Cell; 2019 Feb; 73(4):727-737.e3. PubMed ID: 30709710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of CRISPR adaptation.
Shiriaeva A; Fedorov I; Vyhovskyi D; Severinov K
Biochem Soc Trans; 2020 Feb; 48(1):257-269. PubMed ID: 32010936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reconstitution of CRISPR adaptation in vitro and its detection by PCR.
Fagerlund RD; Ferguson TJ; Maxwell HWR; Opel-Reading HK; Krause KL; Fineran PC
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 616():411-433. PubMed ID: 30691653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spacer-length DNA intermediates are associated with Cas1 in cells undergoing primed CRISPR adaptation.
Musharova O; Klimuk E; Datsenko KA; Metlitskaya A; Logacheva M; Semenova E; Severinov K; Savitskaya E
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Apr; 45(6):3297-3307. PubMed ID: 28204574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distribution and phasing of sequence motifs that facilitate CRISPR adaptation.
Santiago-Frangos A; Buyukyoruk M; Wiegand T; Krishna P; Wiedenheft B
Curr Biol; 2021 Aug; 31(16):3515-3524.e6. PubMed ID: 34174210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Harnessing CRISPR-Cas adaptation for RNA recording and beyond.
Oh GS; An S; Kim S
BMB Rep; 2024 Jan; 57(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 38053290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spontaneous CRISPR loci generation in vivo by non-canonical spacer integration.
Nivala J; Shipman SL; Church GM
Nat Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 3(3):310-318. PubMed ID: 29379209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cas4-Dependent Prespacer Processing Ensures High-Fidelity Programming of CRISPR Arrays.
Lee H; Zhou Y; Taylor DW; Sashital DG
Mol Cell; 2018 Apr; 70(1):48-59.e5. PubMed ID: 29602742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Structural plasticity and in vivo activity of Cas1 from the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system.
Wilkinson ME; Nakatani Y; Staals RH; Kieper SN; Opel-Reading HK; McKenzie RE; Fineran PC; Krause KL
Biochem J; 2016 Apr; 473(8):1063-72. PubMed ID: 26929403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cas4 Nucleases Can Effect Specific Integration of CRISPR Spacers.
Zhang Z; Pan S; Liu T; Li Y; Peng N
J Bacteriol; 2019 Jun; 201(12):. PubMed ID: 30936372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adaptation by Type V-A and V-B CRISPR-Cas Systems Demonstrates Conserved Protospacer Selection Mechanisms Between Diverse CRISPR-Cas Types.
Wu WY; Jackson SA; Almendros C; Haagsma AC; Yilmaz S; Gort G; van der Oost J; Brouns SJJ; Staals RHJ
CRISPR J; 2022 Aug; 5(4):536-547. PubMed ID: 35833800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1-Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex.
Fagerlund RD; Wilkinson ME; Klykov O; Barendregt A; Pearce FG; Kieper SN; Maxwell HWR; Capolupo A; Heck AJR; Krause KL; Bostina M; Scheltema RA; Staals RHJ; Fineran PC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(26):E5122-E5128. PubMed ID: 28611213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cas3-Derived Target DNA Degradation Fragments Fuel Primed CRISPR Adaptation.
Künne T; Kieper SN; Bannenberg JW; Vogel AI; Miellet WR; Klein M; Depken M; Suarez-Diez M; Brouns SJ
Mol Cell; 2016 Sep; 63(5):852-64. PubMed ID: 27546790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CRISPR-Cas systems in Proteus mirabilis.
Fallah MS; Mohebbi A; Yasaghi M; Ghaemi EA
Infect Genet Evol; 2021 Aug; 92():104881. PubMed ID: 33905883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coupling transcriptional activation of CRISPR-Cas system and DNA repair genes by Csa3a in Sulfolobus islandicus.
Liu T; Liu Z; Ye Q; Pan S; Wang X; Li Y; Peng W; Liang Y; She Q; Peng N
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Sep; 45(15):8978-8992. PubMed ID: 28911114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transcriptional regulator-mediated activation of adaptation genes triggers CRISPR de novo spacer acquisition.
Liu T; Li Y; Wang X; Ye Q; Li H; Liang Y; She Q; Peng N
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jan; 43(2):1044-55. PubMed ID: 25567986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
