These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31253365)

  • 1. Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia.
    Kroushev A; Rolnik DL; Mol BW
    Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10198):e9. PubMed ID: 31253365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia.
    Shimazaki M; Maeda Y; Ogawa K; Tanimoto T; Sago H
    Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10198):e10. PubMed ID: 31253364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Zhang's guidelines vs WHO guidelines for diagnosing labour dystocia - Authors' reply.
    Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P; Eggebø TM
    Lancet; 2019 Aug; 394(10198):e11. PubMed ID: 31253363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.
    Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Frøslie KF; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P
    Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):340-348. PubMed ID: 30581039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study protocol: the Labor Progression Study, LAPS - does the use of a dynamic progression guideline in labor reduce the rate of intrapartum cesarean sections in nulliparous women? A multicenter, cluster randomized trial in Norway.
    Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Øian P; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Blix E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Nov; 17(1):370. PubMed ID: 29132336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on childbirth experience measured by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire in the Labor Progression Study (LaPS): A cluster randomized trial.
    Rozsa DJ; Dalbye R; Bernitz S; Blix E; Dalen I; Braut GS; Eggebø TM; Øian P; Sande RK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34859422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concerns about the contemporary labor curves and guidelines: Is it time to revisit the old ones?
    Nunes JP; Pinto PV; Neves AM; Malheiro F; Aguiar T; Gonçalves H; Costa A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():169-175. PubMed ID: 35074690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Labour Progression Study (LaPS): Duration of labour following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph - A cluster randomised trial.
    Dalbye R; Blix E; Frøslie KF; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Olsen IC; Rozsa D; Øian P; Bernitz S
    Midwifery; 2020 Feb; 81():102578. PubMed ID: 31783231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Labor Dystocia: A Common Approach to Diagnosis.
    Neal JL; Lowe NK; Schorn MN; Holley SL; Ryan SL; Buxton M; Wilson-Liverman AM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):499-509. PubMed ID: 26461189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor Dystocia: Uses of Related Nomenclature.
    Neal JL; Ryan SL; Lowe NK; Schorn MN; Buxton M; Holley SL; Wilson-Liverman AM
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):485-98. PubMed ID: 26461188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical atresia complicating parturition; report of a case.
    PULVER M; SCHREIBER MJ
    Harlem Hosp Bull; 1950 Jun; 3(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 15427938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zhang's guideline to assess labour progression.
    Grylka-Baeschlin S; Devane D
    Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):300-301. PubMed ID: 30581040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia.
    Duff P; Southmayd K; Read JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):380-4. PubMed ID: 3347423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dynamic dystocia and cesarean].
    LAFFONT A; BONAFOS M; FARAGGI A; ASSUS A
    Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1950; 2(4):432. PubMed ID: 14792146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Case of dystocia due to a bilateral polycystic disease in a monstrous fetus; cesarean section for a dead fetus..].
    LEFRANC P; BRUN M; VEZIN
    Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1950 Mar; 2(3):320-2. PubMed ID: 15434516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epidural labor analgesia and the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia.
    Fogel ST; Shyken JM; Leighton BL; Mormol JS; Smeltzer JS
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Jul; 87(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 9661559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolving understanding and treatment of labour dystocia.
    Karaçam Z; Walsh D; Bugg GJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():123-7. PubMed ID: 25268780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dystocia due to cicatricial stenosis of the cervix caused by cauterization with a Filhos pencil; cesarean section; new pregnancy followed by spontaneous labor].
    FONTAINE J
    Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1950 Mar; 2(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 15434509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine scar causing obstruction to labor.
    CAFFEE HH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1962 Oct; 84():861. PubMed ID: 13875502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of early amniotomy on dystocia risk and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ghafarzadeh M; Moeininasab S; Namdari M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 25666481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.