These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3125338)

  • 1. Determining evolutionary distances from highly diverged nucleic acid sequences: operator metrics.
    Lake JA
    J Mol Evol; 1987; 26(1-2):59-73. PubMed ID: 3125338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.
    Lake JA
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):167-91. PubMed ID: 3447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Branch Length Transforms using Optimal Tree Metric Matching.
    Arasti S; Tabaghi P; Tabatabaee Y; Mirarab S
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38746464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of higher-primate phylogeny from transversion differences in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA by Lake's methods of evolutionary parsimony and operator metrics.
    Holmquist R; Miyamoto MM; Goodman M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):217-36. PubMed ID: 3386527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
    Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Branch Lengths Help to Locate a Tree in a Phylogenetic Network?
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 Sep; 78(9):1773-1795. PubMed ID: 27659024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust Estimation of Evolutionary Distances with Information Theory.
    Cao MD; Allison L; Dix TI; Bodén M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 May; 33(5):1349-57. PubMed ID: 26912811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matching split distance for unrooted binary phylogenetic trees.
    Bogdanowicz D; Giaro K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 21383415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
    Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculation of evolutionary trees from sequence data.
    Klotz LC; Komar N; Blanken RL; Mitchell RM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1979 Sep; 76(9):4516-20. PubMed ID: 291984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.