These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31253552)

  • 21. Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: A text content analysis.
    Chapman L; Brooks C; Lawson J; Russell C; Adams J
    Chronic Illn; 2019 Mar; 15(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 29254372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2014 Jul; 190(1):144-50. PubMed ID: 24746256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability of online patient resources for melanoma.
    Ibrahim AM; Vargas CR; Koolen PG; Chuang DJ; Lin SJ; Lee BT
    Melanoma Res; 2016 Feb; 26(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 26479217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality and readability of online patient information regarding sclerotherapy for venous malformations.
    Pass JH; Patel AH; Stuart S; Barnacle AM; Patel PA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 May; 48(5):708-714. PubMed ID: 29396791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Readability, complexity, and suitability of online resources for mastectomy and lumpectomy.
    Tran BNN; Singh M; Singhal D; Rudd R; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2017 May; 212():214-221. PubMed ID: 28550909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A
    J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orthopaedic Patient Information on the World Wide Web: An Essential Review.
    Cassidy JT; Baker JF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Feb; 98(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 26888683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.
    Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Farah W; Katabi A; Majzoub A; Seisa MO; Benkhadra R; Alsawas M; Larry P; Murad MH
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29345143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.
    Koo K; Shee K; Yap RL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Sep; 36(7):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 27794197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction.
    Vargas CR; Kantak NA; Chuang DJ; Koolen PG; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 199(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 26088084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the quality and readability of thyroplasty information on the Internet.
    Ting K; Hu A
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 24314830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.