BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31254263)

  • 1. Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.
    Blunden AG; Howe PDL; Little DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):193-227. PubMed ID: 31254263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
    Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can we perceive two colors at the same time? A direct test of Huang and Pashler's (2007) Boolean map theory of visual attention.
    Fitousi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1532-1550. PubMed ID: 30684206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating perceptual integration: uniting response-time- and accuracy-based methodologies.
    Eidels A; Townsend JT; Hughes HC; Perry LA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):659-80. PubMed ID: 25366823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systems factorial technology with R.
    Houpt JW; Blaha LM; McIntire JP; Havig PR; Townsend JT
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):307-30. PubMed ID: 24019062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial interference between attended items engenders serial visual processing.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):229-43. PubMed ID: 23143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization.
    Maddox WT
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1183-200. PubMed ID: 11766943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating perceptual and decisional attention processes in the identification and categorization of integral-dimension stimuli.
    Maddox WT; Dodd JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):467-80. PubMed ID: 12776757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 21058874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical predictions for serial, parallel, and coactive logical rule-based models of categorization response time.
    Little DR
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1148-56. PubMed ID: 22528957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology.
    Fific M; Nosofsky RM; Townsend JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):356-75. PubMed ID: 18377176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalizations of the race model inequality.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):95-122. PubMed ID: 23713201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of perceptual information is more robust than processing of conceptual information in preschool-age children: evidence from costs of switching.
    Fisher AV
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):253-64. PubMed ID: 21349507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.
    VanRullen R; Thorpe SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 May; 13(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 11388919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli.
    Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Donkin C; Denton SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):801-20. PubMed ID: 22905932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention enhances feature integration.
    Paul L; Schyns PG
    Vision Res; 2003 Aug; 43(17):1793-8. PubMed ID: 12826102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prioritization of perceptual processing in categorization.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1079-96. PubMed ID: 20436202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction.
    Shankar S; Kayser AS
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2088-2103. PubMed ID: 28250149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.