522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31254650)
21. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Zaina F; Tomkins-Lane C; Carragee E; Negrini S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD010264. PubMed ID: 26824399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acute neurologic decline in a patient with spinal stenosis: blame it on the epidural fat.
Tardivo V; Scudieri C; Bruzzo M; Lupidi F
Br J Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 38(3):765-770. PubMed ID: 34319197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression.
Tanaka S; Wada K; Kumagai G; Asari T; Aburakawa S; Yamasaki Y; Yokoyama T; Takeuchi K; Ishibashi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1136-E1145. PubMed ID: 33813582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lumbar laminotomy and replantation for the treatment of lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis: A case report.
Yang K; Ji C; Luo D; Li K; Xu H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(30):e26795. PubMed ID: 34397734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of posterior epidural adipose tissue on postoperative outcomes after posterior decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospectively randomized non-inferiority trial.
Lee GW; Mun JU; Ahn MW
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(1):2309499019896871. PubMed ID: 31908178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical research progress of spinal epidural lipomatosis].
Zhang L; Xu Y; Fan P; Li X; Wang J; Tao Y; Li X; Wang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1284-1291. PubMed ID: 37848326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Idiopathic symptomatic epidural lipomatosis of the lumbar spine.
Payer M; Van Schaeybroeck P; Reverdin A; May D
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2003 Apr; 145(4):315-20; discussion 321. PubMed ID: 12748893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in octogenarians; a single center experience of 121 consecutive patients.
Antoniadis A; Ulrich NH; Schmid S; Farshad M; Min K
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 31(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 27648683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Obesity and spinal epidural lipomatosis in cauda equina syndrome.
Cushnie D; Urquhart JC; Gurr KR; Siddiqi F; Bailey CS
Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28756300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between changes in physical function parameters and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Takenaka H; Sugiura H; Kamiya M; Nishihama K; Ito A; Suzuki J; Kawamura M; Hanamura S
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 84(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 36237893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis.
Liu WJ; Hong SW; Liou DY; Lu TW
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 23852436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.
Jönsson B; Annertz M; Sjöberg C; Strömqvist B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2938-44. PubMed ID: 9431630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.
Wi SM; Lee HJ; Chang SY; Kwon OH; Lee CK; Chang BS; Kim H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 30838113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extent of decompression and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma among different techniques of spinal decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Leonardi MA; Zanetti M; Min K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Dec; 26(8):407-14. PubMed ID: 22692194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficacy of surgical treatment on polypharmacy of elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: retrospective exploratory research.
Nagai S; Inagaki R; Michikawa T; Kawabata S; Ito K; Hachiya K; Takeda H; Ikeda D; Kaneko S; Yamada S; Fujita N
BMC Geriatr; 2023 Mar; 23(1):169. PubMed ID: 36964497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion.
Ikegami D; Hosono N; Mukai Y; Tateishi K; Fuji T
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 28323238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
