These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31254947)

  • 41. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.
    Bleka Ø; Benschop CCG; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():85-96. PubMed ID: 27529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories.
    Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
    Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: Results and evaluation.
    Barrio PA; Crespillo M; Luque JA; Aler M; Baeza-Richer C; Baldassarri L; Carnevali E; Coufalova P; Flores I; García O; García MA; González R; Hernández A; Inglés V; Luque GM; Mosquera-Miguel A; Pedrosa S; Pontes ML; Porto MJ; Posada Y; Ramella MI; Ribeiro T; Riego E; Sala A; Saragoni VG; Serrano A; Vannelli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():156-163. PubMed ID: 29783171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles.
    Inman K; Rudin N; Cheng K; Robinson C; Kirschner A; Inman-Semerau L; Lohmueller KE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():298. PubMed ID: 26384762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0247344. PubMed ID: 34653182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
    Myers S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Automated estimation of the number of contributors in autosomal short tandem repeat profiles using a machine learning approach.
    Benschop CCG; van der Linden J; Hoogenboom J; Ypma R; Haned H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102150. PubMed ID: 31476660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing.
    Rasool N; Hussain W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
    Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A tool for simulating single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102746. PubMed ID: 35843122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.