These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31255166)

  • 1. Determination of preference-equivalent levels for fan noise and their prediction by indices based on specific loudness patterns.
    Töpken S; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3399. PubMed ID: 31255166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the reference level on loudness and preference judgements for spectrally manipulated fan sounds.
    Claaßen E; Töpken S; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Mar; 155(3):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 38436425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating occupant satisfaction of HVAC system noise using quality assessment index.
    Forouharmajd F; Nassiri P; Monazzam MR; Yazdchi M
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):135-9. PubMed ID: 22918142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure.
    Stenfelt S; Zeitooni M
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():85-92. PubMed ID: 23562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directional loudness in an anechoic sound field, head-related transfer functions, and binaural summation.
    Sivonen VP; Ellermeier W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2965-80. PubMed ID: 16708953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness as a cue for acceptable noise levels.
    Recker KL; McKinney MF; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 25313550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of adding natural sounds to urban noises on the perceived loudness of noise and soundscape quality.
    Hong JY; Ong ZT; Lam B; Ooi K; Gan WS; Kang J; Feng J; Tan ST
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():134571. PubMed ID: 32000311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):978-90. PubMed ID: 12942977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration.
    Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1349-58. PubMed ID: 11931312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Baer T; Launer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2757-72. PubMed ID: 10335628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near-threshold equal-loudness contours for harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) derived from reaction times during underwater audiometry: a preliminary study.
    Kastelein RA; Wensveen PJ; Terhune JM; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):488-95. PubMed ID: 21303029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
    Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: partial loudness.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):349-60. PubMed ID: 12880046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.