215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31255800)
1. "I Snapchat and Drive!" A mixed methods approach examining snapchat use while driving and deterrent perceptions among young adults.
Truelove V; Freeman J; Davey J
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():146-156. PubMed ID: 31255800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are perceptions of penalties stable across time? The problem of causal ordering in deterrence applied to road safety.
Truelove V; Freeman J; Watson B; Kaye SA; Davey J
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105746. PubMed ID: 32919221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does getting away with it count? An application of stafford and warr's reconceptualised model of deterrence to drink driving.
Szogi E; Darvell M; Freeman J; Truelove V; Palk G; Davey J; Armstrong K
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():261-267. PubMed ID: 28923516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk perceptions and DUI decisions of drivers in different legal environments: New evidence on differential deterrence from a Chinese sample.
Yao J; Xiao T; Hou S
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106188. PubMed ID: 34000676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The law isn't everything: The impact of legal and non-legal sanctions on motorists' drink driving behaviors.
Freeman J; Szogi E; Truelove V; Vingilis E
J Safety Res; 2016 Dec; 59():53-60. PubMed ID: 27846999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding the deterrent impact formal and informal sanctions have on illegal smartphone use while driving.
Kaviani F; Young KL; Robards B; Koppel S
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105706. PubMed ID: 32768605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A unified deterrence-based model of legal and non-legal factors that influence young driver speeding behaviour.
Truelove V; Freeman J; Kaye SA; Watson B; Mills L; Davey J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 160():106327. PubMed ID: 34371286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An application of Stafford and Warr's reconceptualisation of deterrence to a group of recidivist drink drivers.
Freeman J; Watson B
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 May; 38(3):462-71. PubMed ID: 16405859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there an observational effect? An exploratory study into speed cameras and self-reported offending behaviour.
Freeman J; Kaye SA; Truelove V; Davey J
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():201-208. PubMed ID: 28915501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Past behaviours and future intentions: An examination of perceptual deterrence and alcohol consumption upon a range of drink driving events.
Freeman J; Parkes A; Lewis N; Davey JD; Armstrong KA; Truelove V
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105428. PubMed ID: 32004859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age, gender and deterrability: Are younger male drivers more likely to discount the future?
Freeman J; Kaye SA; Truelove V; Davey J
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():1-9. PubMed ID: 28441520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applying Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence theory to drug driving: can it predict those likely to offend?
Watling CN; Palk GR; Freeman JE; Davey JD
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):452-8. PubMed ID: 20159066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.
McDonald CC; Sommers MS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. PubMed ID: 26436243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing specific deterrence effects of increased speeding penalties using four measures of recidivism.
Watson B; Siskind V; Fleiter JJ; Watson A; Soole D
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Nov; 84():27-37. PubMed ID: 26311201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mileage, car ownership, experience of punishment avoidance, and the risky driving of young drivers.
Scott-Parker B; Watson B; King MJ; Hyde MK
Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 22133331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting DUI decisions in different legal environments: investigating deterrence with a conjoint experiment.
Yao J; Johnson MB; Beck KH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 24372492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alcohol-Impaired Driving and Perceived Risks of Legal Consequences.
Sloan FA; McCutchan SA; Eldred LM
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Feb; 41(2):432-442. PubMed ID: 28056493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "It is a different type of policing than in the bush": Police officers' perceptions of the differences in enforcement of the phone use while driving legislation in rural and urban areas.
Truelove V; Stefanidis K; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107046. PubMed ID: 37027899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Young drivers and smartphone use: The impact of legal and non-legal deterrents.
Ogden J; Brown PM; George AM
J Safety Res; 2022 Dec; 83():329-338. PubMed ID: 36481024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
