BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256223)

  • 1. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Dubinskaya A; Bradley MS; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Surgical Team Handoffs on Patient Outcomes.
    Giugale LE; Sears S; Lavelle ES; Carter-Brooks CM; Bonidie M; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):288-292. PubMed ID: 28106651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Berger MB; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):262.e1-262.e7. PubMed ID: 26366666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.