These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256223)

  • 1. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Dubinskaya A; Bradley MS; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy.
    Ashmore S; Kenton K; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):260. PubMed ID: 38904835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Surgical Team Handoffs on Patient Outcomes.
    Giugale LE; Sears S; Lavelle ES; Carter-Brooks CM; Bonidie M; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):288-292. PubMed ID: 28106651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Berger MB; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):262.e1-262.e7. PubMed ID: 26366666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.