These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

543 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256223)

  • 21. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Time of Year on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Renkosiak K; Bradley M; Dubinskaya A; Shepherd JP
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Sep; 28(9):561-566. PubMed ID: 35649240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients.
    Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Supracervical Hysterectomy Is Protective against Mesh Complications after Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 12,189 Patients.
    Dallas K; Taich L; Kuhlmann P; Rogo-Gupta L; Eilber K; Anger JT; Scott V
    J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):669-676. PubMed ID: 34694142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
    Vandendriessche D; Sussfeld J; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Behal H; Cosson M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 27549223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system: The outcomes of 291 patients.
    Chang CP; Hsu FK; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Lee NR; Lee HL; Horng HC; Wang PH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15086. PubMed ID: 30946362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
    Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
    Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse.
    Martín Del Olmo JC; Toledano M; Martín Esteban ML; Montenegro MA; Gómez JR; Concejo P; Rodríguez de Castro M; Del Rio F
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29998390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience.
    Mairesse S; Chazard E; Giraudet G; Cosson M; Bartolo S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 31912174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.