These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256809)

  • 1. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
    Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1400-1406. PubMed ID: 38567838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of contextual information on decision-making in forensic toxicology.
    Hamnett HJ; Dror IE
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():339-348. PubMed ID: 33385132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Continuous challenges in Japanese forensic toxicology practice: strategy to address specific goals].
    Kageura M
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2002 Sep; 56(2-3):219-28. PubMed ID: 12415829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The toxicological significance of post-mortem drug concentrations in bile.
    Ferner RE; Aronson JK
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2018 Jan; 56(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
    Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overview of Forensic Toxicology, Yesterday, Today and in the Future.
    Chung H; Choe S
    Curr Pharm Des; 2017; 23(36):5429-5436. PubMed ID: 28641536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual bias by Forensic Document Examination trainees: An empirical study from China.
    He N; Hao H
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 39025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.
    Leung KN; Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 39025560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 48th annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists (TIAFT). Joint meeting with the Society of Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry (GTFCh). Editorial.
    Kraemer T; Maurer HH; Musshoff F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Feb; 215(1-3):1-2. PubMed ID: 22304901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context Effects in Forensic Entomology and Use of Sequential Unmasking in Casework.
    Archer MS; Wallman JF
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1270-7. PubMed ID: 27378533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence.
    Thompson WC; Scurich N
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination.
    Mattijssen EJ; Kerkhoff W; Berger CE; Dror IE; Stoel RD
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 26976470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The United Kingdom and Ireland association of forensic toxicologists forensic toxicology laboratory guidelines (2018).
    Elliott SP; Stephen DWS; Paterson S
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):335-345. PubMed ID: 30193659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field study.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jul; 60(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 32650935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.