BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256809)

  • 21. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fillers can help control for contextual bias in forensic comparison tasks.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 30035551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists: guidelines for forensic toxicology laboratories.
    Osselton MD
    Sci Justice; 2010 Dec; 50(4):165. PubMed ID: 21075292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) accreditation of forensic pathology services in Europe.
    Mangin P; Bonbled F; Väli M; Luna A; Bajanowski T; Hougen HP; Ludes B; Ferrara D; Cusack D; Keller E; Vieira N
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Mar; 129(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 24997533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Collection of biological samples in forensic toxicology.
    Dinis-Oliveira RJ; Carvalho F; Duarte JA; Remião F; Marques A; Santos A; Magalhães T
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2010 Sep; 20(7):363-414. PubMed ID: 20615091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions.
    Chiam SL; Dror IE; Huber CD; Higgins D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110997. PubMed ID: 34536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Advances in forensic toxicology.
    Peat MA
    Clin Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 18(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 9614587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proceedings of the 2004 Joint Meeting of the Society of Forensic Toxicologists (SOFT) and the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists (TIAFT), 28 August - 3 September 2004, Washington, DC, USA.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 15921867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S; Augsburger M; Aitken CGG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():72-80. PubMed ID: 29734052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blinding or information control in diagnosis: could it reduce errors in clinical decision-making?
    Lockhart JJ; Satya-Murti S
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):179-189. PubMed ID: 30231010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of intact insulin analogues in post-mortem vitreous humour-Application to forensic toxicology casework.
    Beckett N; Tidy R; Douglas B; Priddis C
    Drug Test Anal; 2021 Mar; 13(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 33197145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. State of the art in bile analysis in forensic toxicology.
    Bévalot F; Cartiser N; Bottinelli C; Guitton J; Fanton L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():133-54. PubMed ID: 26773224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists Forensic toxicology laboratory guidelines (2010).
    Cooper GA; Paterson S; Osselton MD;
    Sci Justice; 2010 Dec; 50(4):166-76. PubMed ID: 21075293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
    Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choosing the right laboratory: a review of clinical and forensic toxicology services for urine drug testing in pain management.
    Reisfield GM; Goldberger BA; Bertholf RL
    J Opioid Manag; 2015; 11(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 25750163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.
    Sneyd D; Schreiber Compo N; Rivard J; Pena M; Stoiloff S; Hernandez G
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 32628285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Building Bridges between Clinical and Forensic Toxicology Laboratories.
    Barcelo B; Noce V; Gomila I
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2018; 19(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 29745329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Excerpts from TIAFT 2000. Selected papers from the 38th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists (TIAFT), Helsinki, Finland, 13-17 August 2000.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Sep; 121(1-2):1-150. PubMed ID: 11516879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.