209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31256911)
1. Mobility after intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with either a sliding hip screw or a cephalomedullary nail: Sub group analysis of a randomised trial of 1000 patients.
Ong JCY; Gill JR; Parker MJ
Injury; 2019 Oct; 50(10):1709-1714. PubMed ID: 31256911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sliding hip screw
Parker MJ; Cawley S
Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep; 99-B(9):1210-1215. PubMed ID: 28860402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sliding hip screw versus IM nail in reverse oblique trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A study of 2716 patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
Matre K; Havelin LI; Gjertsen JE; Vinje T; Espehaug B; Fevang JM
Injury; 2013 Jun; 44(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 23305689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.
Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW
J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability.
Parker MJ
Injury; 2017 Dec; 48(12):2762-2767. PubMed ID: 29102044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Adams CI; Robinson CM; Court-Brown CM; McQueen MM
J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Aug; 15(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 11514765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
Chua IT; Rajamoney GN; Kwek EB
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Dec; 21(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 24366790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Are Two Proximal Screws Better Than One?
Serrano R; Blair JA; Watson DT; Infante AF; Shah AR; Mir HR; Maxson BJ; Downes KL; Sanders RW
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Nov; 31(11):577-582. PubMed ID: 28827501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Niu E; Yang A; Harris AH; Bishop J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3647-55. PubMed ID: 26208608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures.
Parker MJ; Bowers TR; Pryor GA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 22371549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Bartonicek I; Dousa P
J Orthop Trauma; 2002 May; 16(5):363-4; author reply 364. PubMed ID: 11972084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of outcomes after different methods of fixation for extracapsular hip fractures: An observational study.
Dunne M; Kuršumović K; Fisher R; Parker M
Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):3031-3035. PubMed ID: 33642086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases.
Crawford CH; Malkani AL; Cordray S; Roberts CS; Sligar W
J Trauma; 2006 Feb; 60(2):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 16508490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques.
Guerra MT; Pasqualin S; Souza MP; Lenz R
Injury; 2014 Nov; 45 Suppl 5():S26-31. PubMed ID: 25528621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.
Loubignac F; Chabas JF
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19345659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
