These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31257136)

  • 21. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Kajikawa Y
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in the 3-dimensional aging changes of the lips among female adults with skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusion.
    Nam JH; Choi Y; Lee KJ; Lee JH; Kim KH; Chung CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Oct; 164(4):516-529. PubMed ID: 37074244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
    Hayashida H; Ioi H; Nakata S; Takahashi I; Counts AL
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20966067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft tissue changes after posterior impaction and setback of the maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy in skeletal class III patients.
    Jeon HM; Choi JY; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1495-500. PubMed ID: 24914752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis.
    Singh GD; Clark WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12831211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft tissue images from cephalograms compared with those from a 3D surface acquisition system.
    Incrapera AK; Kau CH; English JD; McGrory K; Sarver DM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19852641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(7-8):439-45. PubMed ID: 21980651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Soft and hard tissue changes in Class III patients treated by bimaxillary surgery.
    Lin SS; Kerr WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 20(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 9558762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Lin PT; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R; Jernigan C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of setback Le Fort I osteotomy on midfacial soft-tissue changes as evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography superimposition for cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lee JY; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Park SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 23294855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial soft tissue changes following maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Conley RS; Boyd SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1332-40. PubMed ID: 17577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Study of facial soft tissue profile on angle Class II malocclusion with various vertical growth patterns].
    Zhao YH; Wang CL; Liu DX; Wei FL; Zhu K
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Oct; 15(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 17348216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxillary osteotomy: a pilot study.
    Okudaira M; Kawamoto T; Ono T; Moriyama K
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 12(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 18629553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.
    Bock NC; Santo C; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 19194675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.