These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances. Veigl SJ Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):3485-3503. PubMed ID: 34866666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Between relativism and pluralism: Philosophical and political relativism in Feyerabend's late work. Heller L Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Jun; 57():96-105. PubMed ID: 27269268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relativism in Feyerabend's later writings. Kusch M Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Jun; 57():106-13. PubMed ID: 27269269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Historical Epistemology: On the Diversity and Change of Epistemic Values in Science. Carrier M Ber Wiss; 2012 Sep; 35(3):239-251. PubMed ID: 33008188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The epistemic innocence of psychedelic states. Letheby C Conscious Cogn; 2016 Jan; 39():28-37. PubMed ID: 26675408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem. Reutlinger A Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Apr; 92():152-161. PubMed ID: 35182965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objectivity in science and law: A shared rescue strategy. Burch M; Furman K Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 64():60-70. PubMed ID: 31122641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expressivism, Relativism, and the Analytic Equivalence Test. Frápolli MJ; Villanueva N Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1788. PubMed ID: 26635690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value management and model pluralism in climate science. Jebeile J; Crucifix M Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Aug; 88():120-127. PubMed ID: 34166920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During COVID-19: In Search of Epistemic Justice for the 'Wicked' Problems of Post-Normal Times. Mormina M Soc Epistemol; 2022; 36(6):671-685. PubMed ID: 36483160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous? Kidd IJ Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epistemic interests and the objectivity of inquiry. Wilholt T Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Feb; 91():86-93. PubMed ID: 34891050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Explicating the concept of epistemic rationality. Eder AA Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):4975-5000. PubMed ID: 34866671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The epistemic costs of compromise in bioethics. Devolder K; Douglas T Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 29280164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19. Bschir K; Lohse S Synthese; 2022; 200(6):441. PubMed ID: 36320863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value pluralism in research integrity. Peels R; de Ridder J; Haven T; Bouter L Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():18. PubMed ID: 31463085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epistemic trust, epistemic responsibility, and medical practice. Schwab AP J Med Philos; 2008 Aug; 33(4):302-20. PubMed ID: 18662947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]