These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31259248)

  • 1. Patient-Centered Approach to Develop the Patient's Preferences for Prostate Cancer Care (PreProCare) Tool.
    Jayadevappa R; Chhatre S; Gallo JJ; Malkowicz SB; Schwartz JS; Wittink MN
    MDM Policy Pract; 2019; 4(1):2381468319855375. PubMed ID: 31259248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-Centered Preference Assessment to Improve Satisfaction With Care Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jayadevappa R; Chhatre S; Gallo JJ; Wittink M; Morales KH; Lee DI; Guzzo TJ; Vapiwala N; Wong YN; Newman DK; Van Arsdalen K; Malkowicz SB; Schwartz JS; Wein AJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 37(12):964-973. PubMed ID: 30860943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment preference and patient centered prostate cancer care: Design and rationale.
    Jayadevappa R; Chhatre S; Gallo JJ; Wittink M; Morales KH; Bruce Malkowicz S; Lee D; Guzzo T; Caruso A; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Sanford Schwartz J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):296-301. PubMed ID: 26435200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Feasibility and Usability of a Ranking Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Trigger Finger.
    Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Kamal RN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 44(6):480-486.e1. PubMed ID: 30797655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Usability and Feasibility of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients 55 Years and Older.
    Shapiro LM; Eppler SL; Baker LC; Harris AS; Gardner MJ; Kamal RN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 44(10):846-852. PubMed ID: 31495523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient Perceptions of a Decision Support Tool for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Austria M; Kimberlin C; Le T; Lynch KA; Ehdaie B; Atkinson TM; Vickers AJ; Carlsson SV
    MDM Policy Pract; 2023; 8(1):23814683231156427. PubMed ID: 36922982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient preference elicitation instrument, OABCare, to facilitate shared decision-making in the care of overactive bladder.
    Chhatre S; Newman DK; Wein AJ; Jayadevappa R
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Mar; 40(3):791-801. PubMed ID: 33565118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference Elicitation and Treatment Decision-Making Among Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial Results of Healium.
    Diefenbach MA; Marziliano A; Tagai EK; Pfister H; Lapitan E; Hall SJ; Vira M; Ibrahim S; Aibel K; Kutikov A; Horwitz EM; Miyamoto C; Reese AC; Miller SM
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e46552. PubMed ID: 37862103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
    Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating evidence and individual preferences using a web-based multi-criteria decision analytic tool: an application to prostate cancer screening.
    Cunich M; Salkeld G; Dowie J; Henderson J; Bayram C; Britt H; Howard K
    Patient; 2011; 4(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 21766911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals.
    Col NF; Solomon AJ; Springmann V; Garbin CP; Ionete C; Pbert L; Alvarez E; Tierman B; Hopson A; Kutz C; Berrios Morales I; Griffin C; Phillips G; Ngo LH
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 28806143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elderly patients' experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee.
    Rochon D; Eberth JM; Fraenkel L; Volk RJ; Whitney SN
    Health Expect; 2014 Dec; 17(6):840-51. PubMed ID: 22994378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources of Information for Learning and Decision-Making in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Chhatre S; Wittink MN; Gallo JJ; Jayadevappa R
    Am J Mens Health; 2020; 14(5):1557988320945461. PubMed ID: 33000703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A personalized decision aid for prostate cancer shared decision making.
    Bagshaw HP; Martinez A; Heidari N; Scheinker D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Horwitz E; Morton G; Kishan AU; Buyyounouski MK
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Dec; 21(1):374. PubMed ID: 34972513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Provider and Patient Perspectives on a New Tangible Decision Aid Tool to Support Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling with Adolescents and Young Adults.
    Lee SY; Brodyn AL; Koppel RS; Tyler CP; Geppert AA; Truehart AI; Gilliam ML
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 34(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 33096227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment.
    Hoffman A; Crocker L; Mathur A; Holman D; Weston J; Campbell S; Housten A; Bradford A; Agrawala S; Woodard TL
    JMIR Form Res; 2021 Jun; 5(6):e25083. PubMed ID: 34096871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.