These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31259615)

  • 1. A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models.
    Glisic O; Hoejbjerre L; Sonnesen L
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):868-875. PubMed ID: 31259615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients.
    Burhardt L; Livas C; Kerdijk W; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 27476358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback.
    Sfondrini MF; Gandini P; Malfatto M; Di Corato F; Trovati F; Scribante A
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4103232. PubMed ID: 29850512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Impression Technique and Operator Experience on Impression Time and Operator-Reported Outcomes.
    Yilmaz H; Eglenen MN; Cakmak G; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):676-683. PubMed ID: 33533132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
    Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
    Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.
    Liczmanski K; Stamm T; Sauerland C; Blanck-Lubarsch M
    Head Face Med; 2020 May; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 32430023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning.
    Tomita Y; Uechi J; Konno M; Sasamoto S; Iijima M; Mizoguchi I
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):628-633. PubMed ID: 29669951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?
    Chalmers EV; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Gillgrass T; Martin CB; Mossey PA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 26623548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is It Cost Effective to Add an Intraoral Scanner to an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practice?
    Resnick CM; Doyle M; Calabrese CE; Sanchez K; Padwa BL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 77(8):1687-1694. PubMed ID: 30991020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies.
    Kong L; Li Y; Liu Z
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5625-5642. PubMed ID: 35786783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Bosoni C; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Souki BQ; Franchi L; Giuntini V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):585-590. PubMed ID: 36891891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.