These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31260506)
1. What motivates open defecation? A qualitative study from a rural setting in Nepal. Bhatt N; Budhathoki SS; Lucero-Prisno DEI; Shrestha G; Bhattachan M; Thapa J; Sunny AK; Upadhyaya P; Ghimire A; Pokharel PK PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219246. PubMed ID: 31260506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study. Routray P; Schmidt WP; Boisson S; Clasen T; Jenkins MW BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():880. PubMed ID: 26357958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latrine coverage and its utilisation in a rural village of Eastern Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study. Budhathoki SS; Shrestha G; Bhattachan M; Singh SB; Jha N; Pokharel PK BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jun; 10(1):209. PubMed ID: 28606171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia. Ismail AM; Ibrahim MA; Abdi MM; Geremew A; Mulugeta Y; Ayele DM; Cheru A Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1394351. PubMed ID: 38751595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia. Thys S; Mwape KE; Lefèvre P; Dorny P; Marcotty T; Phiri AM; Phiri IK; Gabriël S PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2015 Mar; 9(3):e0003570. PubMed ID: 25739017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: The case of Machakel district in Ethiopia. Temesgen A; Molla Adane M; Birara A; Shibabaw T PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257813. PubMed ID: 34591873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia. Alemu F; Kumie A; Medhin G; Gebre T; Godfrey P BMC Public Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):706. PubMed ID: 28903743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study. Gebremariam B; Hagos G; Abay M PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203458. PubMed ID: 30192803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring barriers to the adoption and utilization of improved latrine facilities in rural Ethiopia: An Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (IBM-WASH) approach. Tamene A; Afework A PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245289. PubMed ID: 33428677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ending open defecation in rural Tanzania: which factors facilitate latrine adoption? Sara S; Graham J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Sep; 11(9):9854-70. PubMed ID: 25247427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enabling Factors for Sustaining Open Defecation-Free Communities in Rural Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Odagiri M; Muhammad Z; Cronin AA; Gnilo ME; Mardikanto AK; Umam K; Asamou YT Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29240667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cluster-randomized multi-level intervention to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child feces in rural Odisha, India: the Sundara Grama research protocol. Caruso BA; Sclar GD; Routray P; Majorin F; Nagel C; Clasen T BMC Public Health; 2019 Mar; 19(1):322. PubMed ID: 30885158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determinants of Latrine Use Behavior: The Psychosocial Proxies of Individual-Level Defecation Practices in Rural Coastal Ecuador. Lopez VK; Berrocal VJ; Corozo Angulo B; Ram PK; Trostle J; Eisenberg JNS Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2019 Mar; 100(3):733-741. PubMed ID: 30675841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processes and challenges of community mobilisation for latrine promotion under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan in rural Odisha, India. Routray P; Torondel B; Jenkins MW; Clasen T; Schmidt WP BMC Public Health; 2017 May; 17(1):453. PubMed ID: 28511653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. Barnard S; Routray P; Majorin F; Peletz R; Boisson S; Sinha A; Clasen T PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71438. PubMed ID: 23990955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing the Last Latrine Nonowners in Rural Malawi. Slekiene J; Mosler HJ Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2018 Jan; 98(1):295-299. PubMed ID: 29141742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toilet Talk: Eliminating Open Defecation and Improved Sanitation in Nepal. McMichael C Med Anthropol; 2018; 37(4):294-310. PubMed ID: 28853953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing patterns and determinants of latrine use in rural settings: A longitudinal study in Odisha, India. Sinha A; Nagel CL; Schmidt WP; Torondel B; Boisson S; Routray P; Clasen TF Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 220(5):906-915. PubMed ID: 28529019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Latent variable modeling to develop a robust proxy for sensitive behaviors: application to latrine use behavior and its association with sanitation access in a middle-income country. Lopez VK; West BT; Clarke PJ; Quentin E; Eisenberg JNS BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 30660198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural south India: an analytical cross-sectional study. Yogananth N; Bhatnagar T Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2018 Jul; 112(7):349-360. PubMed ID: 30032253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]