315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31261119)
41. An Automated Workflow for Hemodynamic Computations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
Nita CI; Suzuki T; Itu LM; Mihalef V; Takao H; Murayama Y; Sharma P; Redel T; Rapaka S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5954617. PubMed ID: 32655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computational fluid dynamics-based virtual angiograms for the detection of flow stagnation in intracranial aneurysms.
Hadad S; Karnam Y; Mut F; Lohner R; Robertson AM; Kaneko N; Cebral JR
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Aug; 39(8):e3740. PubMed ID: 37288602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms--comparison with computed fluid dynamics.
Naito T; Miyachi S; Matsubara N; Isoda H; Izumi T; Haraguchi K; Takahashi I; Ishii K; Wakabayashi T
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jun; 154(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 22392013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Sensitivity of hostile hemodynamics to aneurysm geometry via unsupervised shape interpolation.
MacDonald DE; Cancelliere NM; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Nov; 241():107762. PubMed ID: 37598472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intracranial aneurysms occur more frequently at bifurcation sites that typically experience higher hemodynamic stresses.
Alfano JM; Kolega J; Natarajan SK; Xiang J; Paluch RA; Levy EI; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 23756745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-Phase Ib: Effect of morphology on hemodynamics.
Voß S; Beuing O; Janiga G; Berg P
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216813. PubMed ID: 31100101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hemodynamic characteristics associated with thinner regions of intracranial aneurysm wall.
Jiang P; Liu Q; Wu J; Chen X; Li M; Li Z; Yang S; Guo R; Gao B; Cao Y; Wang R; Wang S
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 67():185-190. PubMed ID: 31253387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Patient-specific computational modeling of cerebral aneurysms with multiple avenues of flow from 3D rotational angiography images.
Castro MA; Putman CM; Cebral JR
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):811-21. PubMed ID: 16777554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Virtual stenting of intracranial aneurysms: application of hemodynamic modification analysis.
Song Y; Choe J; Liu H; Park KJ; Yu H; Lim OK; Kim H; Park D; Ge J; Suh DC
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 26503958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm.
Damiano RJ; Ma D; Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Snyder KV; Meng H
J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3332-40. PubMed ID: 26169778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Approximating hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms with steady flow simulations.
Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Morales HG; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 24262847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment.
Berg P; Voß S; Janiga G; Saalfeld S; Bergersen AW; Valen-Sendstad K; Bruening J; Goubergrits L; Spuler A; Chiu TL; Tsang ACO; Copelli G; Csippa B; Paál G; Závodszky G; Detmer FJ; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Fujimura S; Takao H; Karmonik C; Elias S; Cancelliere NM; Najafi M; Steinman DA; Pereira VM; Piskin S; Finol EA; Pravdivtseva M; Velvaluri P; Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; Paliwal N; Meng H; Seshadhri S; Venguru S; Shojima M; Sindeev S; Frolov S; Qian Y; Wu YA; Carlson KD; Kallmes DF; Dragomir-Daescu D; Beuing O
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1795-1804. PubMed ID: 31054128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Interactive decomposition and mapping of saccular cerebral aneurysms using harmonic functions: its first application with "patient-specific" computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
Jiang J; Strother CM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22955892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms.
Sforza DM; Putman CM; Cebral JR
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012; 28(6-7):801-8. PubMed ID: 25364852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Flow Dynamics of Aneurysm Growth and Rupture: Challenges for the Development of Computational Flow Dynamics as a Diagnostic Tool to Detect Rupture-Prone Aneurysms.
Frösen J
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2016; 123():89-95. PubMed ID: 27637634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Using DFT on ultrasound measurements to determine patient-specific blood flow boundary conditions for computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
Yi H; Yang Z; Bramlage L; Ludwig B
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 176():108563. PubMed ID: 38761498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of Reynolds and Womersley Numbers on the Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms.
Asgharzadeh H; Borazjani I
Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7412926. PubMed ID: 27847544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Computational Fluid Dynamics to Evaluate the Management of a Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm.
Russin J; Babiker H; Ryan J; Rangel-Castilla L; Frakes D; Nakaji P
World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 25541083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hemodynamic factors of spontaneous vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms assessed with numerical and deep learning algorithms: Role of blood pressure and asymmetry.
Martin T; El Hage G; Chaalala C; Peeters JB; Bojanowski MW
Neurochirurgie; 2024 May; 70(3):101519. PubMed ID: 38280371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
