These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31261157)

  • 1. Focus Marking and Prosodic Boundary Strength in French.
    Michelas A; German JS
    Phonetica; 2020; 77(4):244-267. PubMed ID: 31261157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactive Prosodic Marking of Focus, Boundary and Newness in Mandarin.
    Wang B; Xu Y; Ding Q
    Phonetica; 2018; 75(1):24-56. PubMed ID: 28595174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Focus and Phrase Position on East Norwegian Lexical Tonal Accents.
    Kelly NE; Smiljanic R
    Phonetica; 2017; 74(4):193-230. PubMed ID: 28301851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability and Variability in Slovak Prosodic Boundaries.
    Benuš Š; Šimko J
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):163-193. PubMed ID: 28208129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Correlates of Focus Marking in Czech and Polish.
    Hamlaoui F; Żygis M; Engelmann J; Wagner M
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):358-377. PubMed ID: 29781386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phrase boundaries lacking word prosody: An articulatory investigation of Seoul Korean.
    Jang J; Katsika A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):3521-3536. PubMed ID: 38809098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results.
    Tabain M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):516-31. PubMed ID: 12558288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds.
    Szendrői K; Bernard C; Berger F; Gervain J; Höhle B
    J Child Lang; 2018 Jan; 45(1):219-241. PubMed ID: 28462765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: articulatory results.
    Tabain M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 May; 113(5):2834-49. PubMed ID: 12765400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-marking prosodic emphasis in Williams syndrome: results of detailed phonetic analysis.
    Ito K; Martens MA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jan; 52(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 27113718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Status of the Initial Rise as a Marker of Focus in French.
    German JS; D'Imperio M
    Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):165-95. PubMed ID: 27363252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prosodic domain of phonological encoding: Evidence from speech errors.
    Beirne MB; Croot K
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():1-7. PubMed ID: 29614350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local and Global Cues in the Prosodic Realization of Broad and Narrow Focus in Bulgarian.
    Andreeva B; Barry WJ; Koreman J
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):256-278. PubMed ID: 28208148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Accentual Phrase in Singapore English.
    Chong AJ; Sneed German J
    Phonetica; 2017; 74(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 27750223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The f0 perturbation effects in focus marking: Evidence from Korean and Japanese.
    Chen S; Hong Y; Li B; Chun E
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283139. PubMed ID: 36952566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form.
    Greif M; Skopeteas S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():648478. PubMed ID: 34912256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension.
    Birch S; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1995; 38 ( Pt 4)():365-91. PubMed ID: 8816086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intonational structure as a word-boundary cue in Tokyo Japanese.
    Warner N; Otake T; Arai T
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):107-31. PubMed ID: 20415004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of accentual fall on phrase-final vowel duration in Japanese.
    Mori Y; Erickson D
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):148-72. PubMed ID: 18679043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.