123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31261213)
1. The Association Between Physiological Noise Levels and Speech Understanding in Noise.
Stiepan S; Siegel J; Lee J; Souza P; Dhar S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):461-464. PubMed ID: 31261213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability.
Fitzgerald MB; Ward KM; Gianakas SP; Smith ML; Blevins NH; Swanson AP
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):816-826. PubMed ID: 38414136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Large-Scale Study of the Relationship Between Degree and Type of Hearing Loss and Recognition of Speech in Quiet and Noise.
Smith ML; Winn MB; Fitzgerald MB
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):915-928. PubMed ID: 38389129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the possible effect of magnetic resonance imaging noise on peripheral hearing organ with the otoacoustic emission.
Turay CB; Ozer F; Yildirim T; Erbek S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102586. PubMed ID: 32629148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?
Mepani AM; Kirk SA; Hancock KE; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 31584501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of dichotic listening performance in normal-hearing, noise-exposed young females.
Bhatt IS; Wang J
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():10-21. PubMed ID: 31167151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute Alcohol Intake Deteriorates Hearing Thresholds and Speech Perception in Noise.
Choi HG; Hong SK; Lee HJ; Chang J
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33341812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.
Anderson S; Parbery-Clark A; White-Schwoch T; Kraus N
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 22761320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary Guidelines for Replacing Word-Recognition in Quiet With Speech in Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery.
Fitzgerald MB; Gianakas SP; Qian ZJ; Losorelli S; Swanson AC
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1548-1561. PubMed ID: 37703127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outer Hair Cell and Auditory Nerve Function in Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Background Noise.
Hoben R; Easow G; Pevzner S; Parker MA
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():157. PubMed ID: 28439223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
Johnson TA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Dierking DM; Tan H; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between speech perception in noise and electrophysiological measures: an exploratory study of possible techniques to evaluate cochlear synaptopathy in humans.
Megarbane L; Fuente A
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):427-433. PubMed ID: 32003267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing.
Lucks Mendel L; Widner H
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 26189557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
