221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31262207)
1. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
Bulut E; Öztürk G; Taş M; Türkmen MT; Gülmez ZD; Öztürk L
Physiol Int; 2019 Jun; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: a review.
Perrot X; Collet L
Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():27-40. PubMed ID: 23994434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.
Perrot X; Micheyl C; Khalfa S; Collet L
Neurosci Lett; 1999 Mar; 262(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 10218882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Olivocochlear efferent suppression in classical musicians.
Brashears SM; Morlet TG; Berlin CI; Hood LJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Aug; 14(6):314-24. PubMed ID: 14552425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
Bulut E; Öztürk L
Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
Xing D; Gong Q
Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Zhao W; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference in cochlear efferent activity between musicians and non-musicians.
Micheyl C; Khalfa S; Perrot X; Collet L
Neuroreport; 1997 Mar; 8(4):1047-50. PubMed ID: 9141090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
Zevenster S; Naudé A
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
