These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31262207)

  • 1. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
    Bulut E; Öztürk G; Taş M; Türkmen MT; Gülmez ZD; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2019 Jun; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: a review.
    Perrot X; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():27-40. PubMed ID: 23994434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.
    Perrot X; Micheyl C; Khalfa S; Collet L
    Neurosci Lett; 1999 Mar; 262(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 10218882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Olivocochlear efferent suppression in classical musicians.
    Brashears SM; Morlet TG; Berlin CI; Hood LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Aug; 14(6):314-24. PubMed ID: 14552425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
    Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E; Tsakanikos M; Korres S; Dellagrammaticas H; Apostolopoulos N; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
    Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
    Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
    Zevenster S; Naudé A
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Difference in cochlear efferent activity between musicians and non-musicians.
    Micheyl C; Khalfa S; Perrot X; Collet L
    Neuroreport; 1997 Mar; 8(4):1047-50. PubMed ID: 9141090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.