137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31263540)
1. An automated computational biomechanics workflow for improving breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Babarenda Gamage TP; Malcolm DTK; Maso Talou G; Mîra A; Doyle A; Nielsen PMF; Nash MP
Interface Focus; 2019 Aug; 9(4):20190034. PubMed ID: 31263540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of biomechanically informed breast image registration.
Hipwell JH; Vavourakis V; Han L; Mertzanidou T; Eiben B; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):R1-31. PubMed ID: 26733349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards tracking breast cancer across medical images using subject-specific biomechanical models.
Rajagopal V; Lee A; Chung JH; Warren R; Highnam RP; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):651-8. PubMed ID: 18051114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Symmetric Biomechanically Guided Prone-to-Supine Breast Image Registration.
Eiben B; Vavourakis V; Hipwell JH; Kabus S; Buelow T; Lorenz C; Mertzanidou T; Reis S; Williams NR; Keshtgar M; Hawkes DJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 44(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 26577254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of soft tissue modelling to image-guided surgery.
Carter TJ; Sermesant M; Cash DM; Barratt DC; Tanner C; Hawkes DJ
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):893-909. PubMed ID: 16271490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling breast biomechanics for multi-modal image analysis--successes and challenges.
Rajagopal V; Nielsen PMF; Nash MP
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med; 2010; 2(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 20836030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A nonlinear biomechanical model based registration method for aligning prone and supine MR breast images.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Eiben B; Barratt D; Modat M; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Mar; 33(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 24595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CIMIDx: Prototype for a Cloud-Based System to Support Intelligent Medical Image Diagnosis With Efficiency.
Bhavani SR; Senthilkumar J; Chilambuchelvan AG; Manjula D; Krishnamoorthy R; Kannan A
JMIR Med Inform; 2015 Mar; 3(1):e12. PubMed ID: 25830608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.
Kickingereder P; Isensee F; Tursunova I; Petersen J; Neuberger U; Bonekamp D; Brugnara G; Schell M; Kessler T; Foltyn M; Harting I; Sahm F; Prager M; Nowosielski M; Wick A; Nolden M; Radbruch A; Debus J; Schlemmer HP; Heiland S; Platten M; von Deimling A; van den Bent MJ; Gorlia T; Wick W; Bendszus M; Maier-Hein KH
Lancet Oncol; 2019 May; 20(5):728-740. PubMed ID: 30952559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Potential of Deep Learning to Advance Clinical Applications of Computational Biomechanics.
Truskey GA
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 37760168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Taylor Z; Mertzanidou T; Cardoso J; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 57(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 22173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian segmentation of human facial tissue using 3D MR-CT information fusion, resolution enhancement and partial volume modelling.
Şener E; Mumcuoglu EU; Hamcan S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Feb; 124():31-44. PubMed ID: 26574298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element modelling of breast biomechanics: directly calculating the reference state.
Rajagopal V; Chung J; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():420-3. PubMed ID: 17946399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.
Slomka PJ; Dey D; Sitek A; Motwani M; Berman DS; Germano G
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Mar; 14(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 28277804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosing Breast Cancer with Microwave Technology: remaining challenges and potential solutions with machine learning.
Oliveira BL; Godinho D; O'Halloran M; Glavin M; Jones E; Conceição RC
Diagnostics (Basel); 2018 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 29783760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel finite element model-based navigation system-supported workflow for breast tumor excision.
Esslinger D; Rapp P; Knödler L; Preibsch H; Tarín C; Sawodny O; Brucker SY; Hahn M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jul; 57(7):1537-1552. PubMed ID: 30980230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
