These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights. Noble-Allgire AM J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights. Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ruling on physician-assisted suicide near top of agenda at US Supreme Court. Capen K CMAJ; 1997 Jul; 157(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 9238147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital affirms rights of pregnant patients in landmark case; new policy could be model for other hospitals. Hosp Patient Relat Rep; 1991 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10112075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forced cesarean case leads to policy on pregnancy rights. Phillips DF Trustee; 1991 Apr; 44(4):14. PubMed ID: 10183469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C. Tuohey JF Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 11th Circuit finds no constitutional right to medical treatment. Carlson WT Health Law Vigil; 1987 Oct; 10(21):1-3. PubMed ID: 10284533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives. Thornton TE; Paltrow L Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10111987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developments in the law. Medical technology and the law. Harv Law Rev; 1990 May; 103(7):1519-676. PubMed ID: 10106697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court-ordered hospital integration. Mabry HF Case Stud Health Adm; 1980; 2():21-8. PubMed ID: 10250498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to refuse medical treatment. Moody C Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1991; 36(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 10108973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postmortem cesarean section with infant survival: a case report of an HIV-infected patient. Esposito MA; DeLony R; Goldstein PJ Md Med J; 1997 Oct; 46(9):467-70. PubMed ID: 9327647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal versus maternal rights: who is the patient? Goldman EB Mich Hosp; 1983 Apr; 19(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 10259175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]