283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31264513)
21. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
Maloff ES; Hood LJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech-ABR in contralateral noise: A potential tool to evaluate rostral part of the auditory efferent system.
Lotfi Y; Moossavi A; Javanbakht M; Faghih Zadeh S
Med Hypotheses; 2019 Nov; 132():109355. PubMed ID: 31604162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.
Hornickel J; Knowles E; Kraus N
Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):52-8. PubMed ID: 22197852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of performance of hearing aid users using Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) and behavioral measures.
Shalaby AA; El-Kabarity RH; Shafik NA; Abd-Alfattah M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 161():111271. PubMed ID: 35988371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Children With Congenital Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Effects of Late Hearing Aid Amplification-A Pilot Study.
Johansson M; Asp F; Berninger E
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 30998543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive behavioral and physiologic assessment of peripheral and central auditory function in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.
Stahl AN; Racca JM; Kerley CI; Anderson A; Landman B; Hood LJ; Gifford RH; Rex TS
Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108928. PubMed ID: 38086151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rapid exhaustion of auditory neural conduction in a prototypical mitochondrial disease, Friedreich ataxia.
Giraudet F; Charles P; Mom T; Boespflug-Tanguy O; Dürr A; Deltenre P; Avan P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jun; 129(6):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 29625343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Representation of amplified speech at cortical level in good and poor hearing aid performers.
Shetty HN; Puttabasappa M
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(5):558-567. PubMed ID: 31122881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.
Cord MT; Leek MR; Walden BE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Oct; 11(9):475-83. PubMed ID: 11057731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Noise-Induced Changes of the Auditory Brainstem Response to Speech-a Measure of Neural Desynchronisation?
de Boer J; Nuttall HE; Krumbholz K
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 21(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 32285225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cortical encoding of speech acoustics: Effects of noise and amplification.
Kuruvilla-Mathew A; Purdy SC; Welch D
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):852-64. PubMed ID: 26203722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities.
Kouni SN; Giannopoulos S; Ziavra N; Koutsojannis C
Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 23953938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
