1594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31264581)
21. Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Davis S; Simpson E; Hamilton J; James MM; Rawdin A; Wong R; Goka E; Gittoes N; Selby P
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(29):1-314. PubMed ID: 32588816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Point-of-care creatinine tests to assess kidney function for outpatients requiring contrast-enhanced CT imaging: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Corbett M; Duarte A; Llewellyn A; Altunkaya J; Harden M; Harris M; Walker S; Palmer S; Dias S; Soares M
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Aug; 24(39):1-248. PubMed ID: 32840478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A systematic review and economic evaluation of intraoperative tests [RD-100i one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) system and Metasin test] for detecting sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Snowsill T; Cooper C; Meng Y; Hyde C; Mújica-Mota R
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(2):v-xxv, 1-215. PubMed ID: 25586547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population.
Sgroi DC; Sestak I; Cuzick J; Zhang Y; Schnabel CA; Schroeder B; Erlander MG; Dunbier A; Sidhu K; Lopez-Knowles E; Goss PE; Dowsett M
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Oct; 14(11):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 24035531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) mutation testing in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Whiting P; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Armstrong N; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(32):1-166. PubMed ID: 24827857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.
Krop I; Ismaila N; Andre F; Bast RC; Barlow W; Collyar DE; Hammond ME; Kuderer NM; Liu MC; Mennel RG; Van Poznak C; Wolff AC; Stearns V
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(24):2838-2847. PubMed ID: 28692382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: development and validation of a prognostic model.
Crawford F; Chappell FM; Lewsey J; Riley R; Hawkins N; Nicolson D; Heggie R; Smith M; Horne M; Amanna A; Martin A; Gupta S; Gray K; Weller D; Brittenden J; Leese G
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(62):1-198. PubMed ID: 33236718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Budget impact of the Oncotype DX® test compared to other gene expression tests in patients with early breast cancer in Germany.
Lux MP; Minartz C; Müller-Huesmann H; Sandor MF; Herrmann KH; Radeck-Knorre S; Neubauer AS
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2022; 31():100519. PubMed ID: 35093682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The INTRABEAM® Photon Radiotherapy System for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Picot J; Copley V; Colquitt JL; Kalita N; Hartwell D; Bryant J
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(69):1-190. PubMed ID: 26323045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost and Clinical Benefits Associated with Oncotype DX® Test in Patients with Early-Stage HR+/HER2- Node-Negative Breast Cancer in the Netherlands.
de Jongh FE; Efe R; Herrmann KH; Spoorendonk JA
Int J Breast Cancer; 2022; 2022():5909724. PubMed ID: 36250028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship of Oncotype Dx score with tumor grade, size, nodal status, proliferative marker Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index in early breast cancer tumors in Saudi Population.
Durrani S; Al-Mushawa F; Heena H; Wani T; Al-Qahtani A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Apr; 51():151674. PubMed ID: 33360027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation.
Walton M; Wade R; Claxton L; Sharif-Hurst S; Harden M; Patel J; Rowe I; Hodgson R; Eastwood A
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Sep; 24(48):1-264. PubMed ID: 33001024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Medina-Lara A; Grigore B; Lewis R; Peters J; Price S; Landa P; Robinson S; Neal R; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(66):1-332. PubMed ID: 33252328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review.
Beyer F; Rice S; Orozco-Leal G; Still M; O'Keefe H; O'Connor N; Stoniute A; Craig D; Pereira S; Carr L; Leeds J
Health Technol Assess; 2023 May; 27(7):1-118. PubMed ID: 37212444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Utility of Oncotype DX for Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment Decisions in Estrogen Receptor-positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative, Node-negative Breast Cancer.
Rizki H; Hillyar C; Abbassi O; Miles-Dua S
Cureus; 2020 Mar; 12(3):e7269. PubMed ID: 32195072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with stage 1 cutaneous melanoma post primary tumour excision: three systematic reviews and an economic model.
Vale L; Kunonga P; Coughlan D; Kontogiannis V; Astin M; Beyer F; Richmond C; Wilson D; Bajwa D; Javanbakht M; Bryant A; Akor W; Craig D; Lovat P; Labus M; Nasr B; Cunliffe T; Hinde H; Shawgi M; Saleh D; Royle P; Steward P; Lucas R; Ellis R
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(64):1-178. PubMed ID: 34792018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]