765 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3126470)
1. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New synthetic resorbable suture material in animal experiments and in clinical testing].
Henke R; Kairies U
Zentralbl Chir; 1984; 109(10):641-50. PubMed ID: 6435336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
Walton M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Single-layer closure of a subcostal incision using a monofilament absorbable suture material--comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglyconate (Maxon)].
Vracko J; Pegan V
Acta Chir Iugosl; 1989; 36(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 2496545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder].
Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP
Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental study in the urinary tract of a new smooth surface absorbable synthetic monofilament (author's transl)].
Beurton D; Gonties D; Terdjman S; Abraham SH; Dana A
J Urol (Paris); 1981; 87(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 6792291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
Walton M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
Chu CC; Kizil Z
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A
Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture material in bladder surgery: a comparison of polydioxanone, polyglactin, and chromic catgut.
Stewart DW; Buffington PJ; Wacksman J
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1261-3. PubMed ID: 2111412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the physical parameters and handling properties of short-duration and middle-duration absorbable suture materials].
Thiede A; Stüwe W; Lünstedt B
Chirurg; 1985 Dec; 56(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 3002727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.
Weld KJ; Arzola J; Montiglio C; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18242360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.
Greenwald D; Shumway S; Albear P; Gottlieb L
J Surg Res; 1994 Apr; 56(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 8152233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
Breuninger H; Haueisen S
Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
