These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31265781)

  • 1. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the Key for Accurate Absorption and Emission Calculations, Energy or Geometry?
    Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1534-1543. PubMed ID: 29365256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments.
    Sarkar R; Boggio-Pasqua M; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):1117-1132. PubMed ID: 33492950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculations of n→π* Transition Energies: Comparisons Between TD-DFT, ADC, CC, CASPT2, and BSE/GW Descriptions.
    Azarias C; Habert C; Budzák Š; Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2017 Aug; 121(32):6122-6134. PubMed ID: 28738157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do TD-DFT excitation energies of BODIPY/Aza-BODIPY families largely deviate from experiment? Answers from electron correlated and multireference methods.
    Momeni MR; Brown A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2619-32. PubMed ID: 26575559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Reference Energies and Benchmarks.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Blondel A; Garniron Y; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4360-4379. PubMed ID: 29966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(47):10174-10188. PubMed ID: 34792354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemically Accurate 0-0 Energies with Not-so-Accurate Excited State Geometries.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2481-2491. PubMed ID: 30802404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Sized Molecules.
    Loos PF; Lipparini F; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1711-1741. PubMed ID: 31986042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of TD-DFT Geometries: A Fresh Look.
    Brémond E; Savarese M; Adamo C; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jul; 14(7):3715-3727. PubMed ID: 29883546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extensive TD-DFT Benchmark: Singlet-Excited States of Organic Molecules.
    Jacquemin D; Wathelet V; Perpète EA; Adamo C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Sep; 5(9):2420-35. PubMed ID: 26616623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarks for 0-0 transitions of aromatic organic molecules: DFT/B3LYP, ADC(2), CC2, SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2 compared to high-resolution gas-phase data.
    Winter NO; Graf NK; Leutwyler S; Hättig C
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May; 15(18):6623-30. PubMed ID: 23111753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3.
    Sauer SP; Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Thiel W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Mar; 5(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 26610222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computation of accurate excitation energies for large organic molecules with double-hybrid density functionals.
    Goerigk L; Moellmann J; Grimme S
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2009 Jun; 11(22):4611-20. PubMed ID: 19475182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is ADC(3) as Accurate as CC3 for Valence and Rydberg Transition Energies?
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Feb; 11(3):974-980. PubMed ID: 31913639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Practical Standard Coupled Cluster Calculations Agree Better than Kohn-Sham Calculations with Currently Available Functionals When Compared to the Best Available Experimental Data for Dissociation Energies of Bonds to 3d Transition Metals?
    Xu X; Zhang W; Tang M; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 May; 11(5):2036-52. PubMed ID: 26574408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3757-65. PubMed ID: 26588520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 0-0 Energies Using Hybrid Schemes: Benchmarks of TD-DFT, CIS(D), ADC(2), CC2, and BSE/GW formalisms for 80 Real-Life Compounds.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5340-59. PubMed ID: 26574326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. TD-CI simulation of the electronic optical response of molecules in intense fields II: comparison of DFT functionals and EOM-CCSD.
    Sonk JA; Schlegel HB
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(42):11832-40. PubMed ID: 21923137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.