These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31266430)

  • 1. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
    Hasshim N; Downes M; Bate S; Parris BA
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components.
    Ferrand L; Ducrot S; Chausse P; Maïonchi-Pino N; O'Connor RJ; Parris BA; Perret P; Riggs KJ; Augustinova M
    Dev Sci; 2020 Mar; 23(2):e12899. PubMed ID: 31483912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
    Burca M; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
    Burca M; Beaucousin V; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task.
    Parris BA; Wadsley MG; Arabaci G; Hasshim N; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Brain Struct Funct; 2021 May; 226(4):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 33608822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.
    Chen Z; Lei X; Ding C; Li H; Chen A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():577-84. PubMed ID: 23103691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response Modality and the Stroop Task.
    Parris BA; Sharma D; Weekes BSH; Momenian M; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 66(5):361-367. PubMed ID: 31696793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming.
    Roelofs A; Piai V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):782-792. PubMed ID: 26967984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mouse-tracking study of the composite nature of the Stroop effect at the level of response execution.
    Quétard B; Spatola N; Parris BA; Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0279036. PubMed ID: 36656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychological distance and reaction time in a Stroop task.
    De Marchis G; Rivero Expósito Mdel P; Reales Avilés JM
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23729236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
    Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.