These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31266430)

  • 21. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
    Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interference in Dutch-French Bilinguals.
    Schmidt JR; Hartsuiker RJ; De Houwer J
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Jan; 65(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 29415648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus and response conflict from a second language: Stroop interference in weakly-bilingual and recently-trained languages.
    Šaban I; Schmidt JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103360. PubMed ID: 34218077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):721-733. PubMed ID: 27714665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Ferrand L; Llorca PM; Flaudias V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.
    Parris BA; Hasshim N; Wadsley M; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1029-1053. PubMed ID: 34389901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond interference control impairment in ADHD: evidence from increased intraindividual variability in the color-stroop test.
    Borella E; de Ribaupierre A; Cornoldi C; Chicherio C
    Child Neuropsychol; 2013 Sep; 19(5):495-515. PubMed ID: 22738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference: analysis by response modality and evaluation.
    Ikeda Y; Hirata S; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):654-60. PubMed ID: 20499573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.
    van Veen V; Carter CS
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
    Morey CC; Elliott EM; Wiggers J; Eaves SD; Shelton JT; Mall JT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence accumulation in the integrated and primed Stroop tasks.
    Kinoshita S; de Wit B; Aji M; Norris D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):824-836. PubMed ID: 28364405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prepotent task-irrelevant semantic information is dampened by domain-specific control mechanisms during visual word recognition.
    Sulpizio S; Job R; Leoni P; Scaltritti M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):390-405. PubMed ID: 34165355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.
    Stuart DM; Carrasco M
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(3):383-405. PubMed ID: 21957508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
    Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.
    Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):425-31. PubMed ID: 24002970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: an event-related fMRI study.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Cortex; 2009 Feb; 45(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 19150520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.
    Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stroop-interference effect in post-traumatic stress disorder.
    Cui H; Chen G; Liu X; Shan M; Jia Y
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 13(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 25182347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The role of semantic attributes of the distractor word in the script type effect on the Stroop color-word interference task].
    Hayashi R
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Apr; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3210456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.