133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31266745)
1. A traditional hip implant is as effective as newer types for people over 65.
Cook R; Lamont T; Martin R;
BMJ; 2019 Jul; 366():l4230. PubMed ID: 31266745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bearing couples in total hip arthroplasty.
Tailor H; Patel S; Patel RV; Haddad FS
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2010 Aug; 71(8):446-50. PubMed ID: 20852486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hip replacement.
Ferguson RJ; Palmer AJ; Taylor A; Porter ML; Malchau H; Glyn-Jones S
Lancet; 2018 Nov; 392(10158):1662-1671. PubMed ID: 30496081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of Prosthetic Implant Combinations in Total Hip Replacement: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using UK and Swedish Hip Joint Registries Data.
Fawsitt CG; Thom HHZ; Hunt LP; Nemes S; Blom AW; Welton NJ; Hollingworth W; López-López JA; Beswick AD; Burston A; Rolfson O; Garellick G; Marques EMR
Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):303-312. PubMed ID: 30832968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of femoral stems with exchangeable necks in primary total hip arthroplasty increases the rate of revision.
Graves SE; de Steiger R; Davidson D; Donnelly W; Rainbird S; Lorimer MF; Cashman KS; Vial RJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jun; 99-B(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 28566395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Postoperative Complications Following Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With Other Hip Bearings in Medicare Population.
Kleeman LT; Bala A; Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1826-1832. PubMed ID: 29510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost Analysis of Ceramic Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Carnes KJ; Odum SM; Troyer JL; Fehring TK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Nov; 98(21):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 27807111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Durom acetabular component. a concise follow-up of early revision rates at a minimum of 2 years.
Hutt J; Dodd M; Briffa N; Bourke H; Hazlerigg A; Ward D
Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 23100148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Coxarthrosis. e) 10-year results with total hip endoprostheses Balgrist 1962-1968].
Dietschi C
Orthopade; 1979 Jan; 8(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 15655968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Joint replacement: how to lower re-surgery rates].
Glatz U
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Sep; 136(36):p26. PubMed ID: 21904995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed fracture of a ceramic insert with modern ceramic total hip replacement.
Min BW; Song KS; Kang CH; Bae KC; Won YY; Lee KY
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 17197321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years' follow-up.
Hanna SA; Somerville L; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jan; 98-B(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 26733512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hip and knee arthroplasty 2011: what's new, what's true, does it matter? Evidence based issues.
Rosenberg AG; Berend ME; Berry DJ; Della Valle CJ; Macdonald SJ; Minas T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):157-66. PubMed ID: 23118407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
