These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31267029)

  • 1. Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.
    Sessa F; Salerno M; Bertozzi G; Messina G; Ricci P; Ledda C; Rapisarda V; Cantatore S; Turillazzi E; Pomara C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9542. PubMed ID: 31267029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.
    Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.
    Währer J; Kehm S; Allen M; Brauer L; Eidam O; Seiberle I; Kron S; Scheurer E; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102830. PubMed ID: 36702080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
    Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation.
    Fonneløp AE; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():155-162. PubMed ID: 26005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A molecular exploration of human DNA/RNA co-extracted from the palmar surface of the hands and fingers.
    Lacerenza D; Aneli S; Omedei M; Gino S; Pasino S; Berchialla P; Robino C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():44-53. PubMed ID: 26844918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery of mtDNA from unfired metallic ammunition components with an assessment of sequence profile quality and DNA damage through MPS analysis.
    Holland MM; Bonds RM; Holland CA; McElhoe JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():86-96. PubMed ID: 30611826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 24315606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collection of Samples for DNA Analysis.
    van Oorschot RA; Verdon TJ; Ballantyne KN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1420():1-12. PubMed ID: 27259727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of preprocessing methods and storage times for touch DNA samples.
    Dong H; Wang J; Zhang T; Ge JY; Dong YQ; Sun QF; Liu C; Li CX
    Croat Med J; 2017 Feb; 58(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 28252870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.