These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31267199)

  • 1. Microfluidic-based immunohistochemistry for breast cancer diagnosis: a comparative clinical study.
    Aimi F; Procopio MG; Alvarez Flores MT; Brouland JP; Piazzon N; Brajkovic S; Dupouy DG; Gijs M; de Leval L
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):313-323. PubMed ID: 31267199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
    Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concordance between ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2-low expression in breast cancer by MammaTyper RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry: implications for the practising pathologist.
    Badr NM; Zaakouk M; Zhang Q; Kearns D; Kong A; Shaaban AM
    Histopathology; 2024 Sep; 85(3):437-450. PubMed ID: 38651302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of predictive markers (hormone receptors, Her2, Ki67) and intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer in four consecutive years 2015-2018.
    Stevanovic L; Choschzick M; Moskovszky L; Varga Z
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 145(12):2983-2994. PubMed ID: 31628534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Xie Z; Luo J; Wang Y; Zhou J; Huang L; Li H; Wang L; Liu P; Shu M; Zhang W; Ke Z
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Aug; 194(3):517-529. PubMed ID: 35789315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-testing of predictive biomarkers on surgical breast cancer specimens is clinically relevant.
    Robertson S; Rönnlund C; de Boniface J; Hartman J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 30659433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking for more reliable biomarkers in breast cancer: Comparison between routine methods and RT-qPCR.
    Caselli E; Pelliccia C; Teti V; Bellezza G; Mandarano M; Ferri I; Hartmann K; Laible M; Sahin U; Varga Z; Lupi C; Stracci F; Sidoni A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0255580. PubMed ID: 34555047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for determining HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Kammori M; Kurabayashi R; Kashio M; Sakamoto A; Yoshimoto M; Amano S; Kaminishi M; Yamada T; Takubo K
    Oncol Rep; 2008 Mar; 19(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 18288397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: results from ABCSG Trial 6.
    Filipits M; Rudas M; Singer CF; Fitzal F; Bago-Horvath Z; Greil R; Balic M; Lax SF; Halper S; Hulla W; Wu NC; Liu X; Weidler J; Bates M; Hlauschek D; Gnant M; Dubsky P
    ESMO Open; 2021 Aug; 6(4):100228. PubMed ID: 34371382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.
    Sinn HP; Schneeweiss A; Keller M; Schlombs K; Laible M; Seitz J; Lakis S; Veltrup E; Altevogt P; Eidt S; Wirtz RM; Marmé F
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28193205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform.
    Wu NC; Wong W; Ho KE; Chu VC; Rizo A; Davenport S; Kelly D; Makar R; Jassem J; Duchnowska R; Biernat W; Radecka B; Fujita T; Klein JL; Stonecypher M; Ohta S; Juhl H; Weidler JM; Bates M; Press MF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):327-338. PubMed ID: 30120700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
    Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of current prognostic and predictive markers in breast cancer: a validation study of tissue microarrays.
    Batistatou A; Televantou D; Bobos M; Eleftheraki AG; Kouvaras E; Chrisafi S; Koukoulis GK; Malamou-Mitsi V; Fountzilas G
    Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2139-45. PubMed ID: 23645767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
    Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 and Ki67 in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
    Bjerre C; Knoop A; Bjerre K; Larsen MS; Henriksen KL; Lyng MB; Ditzel HJ; Rasmussen BB; Brünner N; Ejlertsen B; Laenkholm AV
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 23205744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Assessing the Value of Repeated Centralized Testing in Excision Specimens.
    Hariri N; Hasteh F; Walavalkar V; Roma AA; Fadare O
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019 Jan; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features.
    Ning SF; Li JL; Luo CP; Wei CH; Lu YK; Liu HZ; Wei WE; Zhang LT
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(12):8740-7. PubMed ID: 25674240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer in Ethiopia: evidence for geographic difference in the distribution of molecular subtypes in Africa.
    Hadgu E; Seifu D; Tigneh W; Bokretsion Y; Bekele A; Abebe M; Sollie T; Merajver SD; Karlsson C; Karlsson MG
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 29444670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.
    Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas.
    Monaco SE; Wu Y; Teot LA; Cai G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 22045649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.