132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31267550)
1. Stochastic approximation EM for large-scale exploratory IRT factor analysis.
Camilli G; Geis E
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):3997-4012. PubMed ID: 31267550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extension of the SAEM algorithm for nonlinear mixed models with 2 levels of random effects.
Panhard X; Samson A
Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 18583352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.
Savic R; Lavielle M
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 19680795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.
Savic RM; Mentré F; Lavielle M
AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 21063925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An improved stochastic EM algorithm for large-scale full-information item factor analysis.
Zhang S; Chen Y; Liu Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):44-71. PubMed ID: 30511445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fisher information matrix for nonlinear mixed effects multiple response models: evaluation of the appropriateness of the first order linearization using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.
Bazzoli C; Retout S; Mentré F
Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1940-56. PubMed ID: 19266541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More efficient parameter estimates for factor analysis of ordinal variables by ridge generalized least squares.
Yuan KH; Jiang G; Cheng Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):525-564. PubMed ID: 28547838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
Urban CJ; Bauer DJ
Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 33528784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Mixed Stochastic Approximation EM (MSAEM) Algorithm for the Estimation of the Four-Parameter Normal Ogive Model.
Meng X; Xu G
Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1407-1442. PubMed ID: 35648266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. REML estimation of variance parameters in nonlinear mixed effects models using the SAEM algorithm.
Meza C; Jaffrézic F; Foulley JL
Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):876-88. PubMed ID: 17638294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantile regression in linear mixed models: a stochastic approximation EM approach.
Galarza CE; Lachos VH; Bandyopadhyay D
Stat Interface; 2017; 10(3):471-482. PubMed ID: 29104713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ordinary Least Squares Estimation of Parameters in Exploratory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data.
Lee CT; Zhang G; Edwards MC
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar; 47(2):314-39. PubMed ID: 26734852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for High-Dimensional Diagnostic Classification Models.
Liu CW
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):662-674. PubMed ID: 36262522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The SAEM algorithm for group comparison tests in longitudinal data analysis based on non-linear mixed-effects model.
Samson A; Lavielle M; Mentré F
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4860-75. PubMed ID: 17562540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm.
Dubois A; Lavielle M; Gsteiger S; Pigeolet E; Mentré F
Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2582-600. PubMed ID: 21793036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the nlmixr R package for population pharmacokinetic modeling: A metformin case study.
Mak WY; Ooi QX; Cruz CV; Looi I; Yuen KH; Standing JF
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 89(1):330-339. PubMed ID: 35976674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of FOCEI and SAEM Estimation Methods in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using NONMEM
Sukarnjanaset W; Wattanavijitkul T; Jarurattanasirikul S
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2018 Dec; 43(6):729-736. PubMed ID: 29785609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic analysis of growth curves using the SAEM algorithm.
Jaffrézic F; Meza C; Lavielle M; Foulley JL
Genet Sel Evol; 2006; 38(6):583-600. PubMed ID: 17129561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Penalized Least Squares for Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Responses.
Huang PH
Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):279-297. PubMed ID: 32990059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
