These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31267982)
21. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis. Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation. Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists. Chua JT; Nguyen E; Risbud A; Soltanzadeh-Zarandi S; Lee A; Jamshidi S; Bayginejad S; Abouzari M Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct; 131(10):2356-2360. PubMed ID: 33625763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Zhao HH; Luu M; Spiegel B; Daskivich TJ J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e11258. PubMed ID: 33107826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites. Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons? Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument. Emmert M; Meier F J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Narrative Comments about Urologists on Physician Rating Websites Provide Insight into What Drives Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Policastro CG; Carnes B; Friedman D; Ginzburg N; Ferry EK Urol Pract; 2019 Jul; 6(4):222-226. PubMed ID: 37317469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study. Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades. Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites. McCormick JR; Patel MS; Hodakowski AJ; Rea PM; Naik KP; Cohn MR; Mehta N; Damodar D; Abboud JA; Garrigues GE J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Dec; 30(12):e713-e723. PubMed ID: 34343661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists. Goshtasbi K; Lehrich BM; Moshtaghi O; Abouzari M; Sahyouni R; Bagheri K; Moshtaghi A; Tajran SD; Lee L; Lin HW; Djalilian HR Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 30531643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Online Reviews of American Urologists and Opportunities for Improvement. Khan HI; Franks NJ; Liu Q; Choi BY; Smith ER; Daskovich TJ; Liss MA Urol Pract; 2020 Nov; 7(6):474-480. PubMed ID: 37287182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations. Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study. Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings. Emmert M; Halling F; Meier F J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e15. PubMed ID: 25582914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study. Emmert M; Meier F; Pisch F; Sander U J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e187. PubMed ID: 23985220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]