BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31268151)

  • 1. Does Neck Disability Index Correlate With 12-Month Satisfaction After Elective Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy? Results From a National Spine Registry.
    Khan I; Sivaganesan A; Archer KR; Bydon M; McGirt MJ; Nian H; Harrell FE; Foley KT; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Shaffrey C; Harbaugh R; Asher AL; Devin CJ;
    Neurosurgery; 2020 May; 86(5):736-741. PubMed ID: 31268151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-Specific Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction After Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases.
    Chotai S; Sivaganesan A; Parker SL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Aug; 77(2):157-63; discussion 163. PubMed ID: 25910085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Validation of Cervical Prediction Models for Patient-Reported Outcomes at 1 Year After Cervical Spine Surgery for Radiculopathy and Myelopathy.
    Archer KR; Bydon M; Khan I; Nian H; Pennings JS; Harrell FE; Sivaganesan A; Chotai S; McGirt MJ; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Knightly JJ; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL; Devin CJ;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):1541-1552. PubMed ID: 32796461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications, readmissions, reoperations and patient-reported outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis undergoing elective spine surgery - a propensity matched analysis.
    Steinle AM; Nian H; Pennings JS; Bydon M; Asher A; Archer KR; Gardocki RJ; Zuckerman SL; Stephens BF; Abtahi AM
    Spine J; 2022 Nov; 22(11):1820-1829. PubMed ID: 35779839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction and Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy?
    Goh GS; Yue WM; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(10):E568-E575. PubMed ID: 33290363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of patients' functional status on satisfaction with outcomes 12 months after elective spine surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Bydon M; McGirt MJ; Nian H; Harrell FE; Dittus RS; Asher AL;
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 28970074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 5- to 8-year randomized study on the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion plus physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone.
    Engquist M; Löfgren H; Öberg B; Holtz A; Peolsson A; Söderlund A; Vavruch L; Lind B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 27564856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How closely are outcome questionnaires correlated to patient satisfaction after cervical spine surgery for myelopathy?
    Zaki MM; Joshi RS; Ibrahim S; Michalopoulos GD; Linzey JR; Saadeh YS; Upadhyaya C; Coric D; Potts EA; Bisson EF; Turner JD; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Foley KT; Tumialan L; Shaffrey ME; Bydon M; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Chan AK; Meyer S; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Gottfried ON; Than KD; Wang M; Haid R; Slotkin JR; Glassman SD; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 May; 38(5):521-529. PubMed ID: 36805998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of predominant symptom location among patients undergoing cervical spine surgery on 12-month outcomes: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Devin CJ; Asher AL; Alvi MA; Yolcu YU; Kerezoudis P; Shaffrey CI; Bisson EF; Knightly JJ; Mummaneni PV; Foley KT; Bydon M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 34243164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes after surgery for cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals : a nationwide relative effectiveness study.
    Danielsen E; Gulati S; Salvesen Ø; Ingebrigtsen T; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Bone Joint J; 2023 Jan; 105-B(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 36587250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of preoperative mental distress versus surgical modality, arthroplasty, or fusion on long-term outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
    MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Olerud C
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 30004317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Costs Associated With Revision Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Diseases.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Wick JB; Stonko DP; Sivaganesan A; Devin CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Apr; 43(7):E423-E429. PubMed ID: 28767625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A predictive model and nomogram for predicting return to work at 3 months after cervical spine surgery: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Devin CJ; Bydon M; Alvi MA; Kerezoudis P; Khan I; Sivaganesan A; McGirt MJ; Archer KR; Foley KT; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Knightly JJ; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E9. PubMed ID: 30453462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy.
    Tonosu J; Inanami H; Oka H; Takano Y; Koga H; Yuzawa Y; Shiboi R; Oshima Y; Baba S; Tanaka S; Matsudaira K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 29361919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors Affecting the Outcome of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Controlled Study.
    Engquist M; Löfgren H; Öberg B; Holtz A; Peolsson A; Söderlund A; Vavruch L; Lind B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):1553-63. PubMed ID: 26192721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.