These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31268837)

  • 21. The impact of salience and visual working memory on the monitoring and control of saccadic behavior: An eye-tracking and EEG study.
    Weaver MD; Hickey C; van Zoest W
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):544-554. PubMed ID: 28072451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.
    Failing M; Nissens T; Pearson D; Le Pelley M; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct; 114(4):2316-27. PubMed ID: 26289464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set.
    Munneke J; Hoppenbrouwers SS; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2540-8. PubMed ID: 26178858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective attention moderates the relationship between attentional capture by signals of nondrug reward and illicit drug use.
    Albertella L; Copeland J; Pearson D; Watson P; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2017 Jun; 175():99-105. PubMed ID: 28411561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Value-driven attentional capture in adolescence.
    Roper ZJ; Vecera SP; Vaidya JG
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1987-93. PubMed ID: 25210012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
    Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104125. PubMed ID: 31751815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?
    Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Vuilleumier P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160469. PubMed ID: 27483371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation.
    Cane JE; Ferguson HJ; Apperly IA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):591-610. PubMed ID: 28068126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.
    Tankelevitch L; Spaak E; Rushworth MFS; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(26):5033-5050. PubMed ID: 32366722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task.
    Krawczyk DC; Gazzaley A; D'Esposito M
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1141():168-77. PubMed ID: 17320835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reward grabs the eye: oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli.
    Theeuwes J; Belopolsky AV
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():80-5. PubMed ID: 22902641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reward-associated stimuli capture the eyes in spite of strategic attentional set.
    Hickey C; van Zoest W
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():67-74. PubMed ID: 24084197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual salience affects performance in a working memory task.
    Fine MS; Minnery BS
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(25):8016-21. PubMed ID: 19553441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Positive emotions have a unique capacity to capture attention.
    Gupta R
    Prog Brain Res; 2019; 247():23-46. PubMed ID: 31196436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shielding cognition from nociception with working memory.
    Legrain V; Crombez G; Plaghki L; Mouraux A
    Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1922-34. PubMed ID: 23026759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.