193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31269024)
1. Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Allanson ER; Powell A; Bulsara M; Lee HL; Denny L; Leung Y; Cohen P
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0217775. PubMed ID: 31269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review.
He H; Zeng D; Ou H; Tang Y; Li J; Zhong H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 23506718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
Bhave Chittawar P; Franik S; Pouwer AW; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD004638. PubMed ID: 25331441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy after concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer compared to laparotomy: A multi institutional prospective pilot study of cost, surgical outcome and quality of life.
Baffert S; Alran S; Fourchotte V; Traore MA; Simondi C; Mathevet P; Loustalot C; Binelli C; Jaffre I; Barranger E; Dupre PF; Ferron G; Houvenaeghel G; Leveque J; Descamps P; Body G; Raudrant D; Classe JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 26518159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Gumber AO; Wong CS
Int J Surg; 2016 Oct; 34():127-136. PubMed ID: 27575832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.
Wang YZ; Deng L; Xu HC; Zhang Y; Liang ZQ
BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():928. PubMed ID: 26596955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer.
Wang X; Liu R; Ma B; Yang K; Tian J; Jiang L; Bai ZG; Hao XY; Wang J; Li J; Sun SL; Yin H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jul; (7):CD007563. PubMed ID: 20614461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours.
Medeiros LR; Fachel JM; Garry R; Stein AT; Furness S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jul; (3):CD004751. PubMed ID: 16034946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management.
Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chang CW; Yen YK; Huang YH; Liu WM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1105-11. PubMed ID: 24927245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medeiros LR; Stein AT; Fachel J; Garry R; Furness S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17692084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.
Liang C; Liu P; Cui Z; Liang Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 31806399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Humphry N; Jones M; Goodison S; Carter B; Hewitt J
J Frailty Aging; 2023; 12(4):305-310. PubMed ID: 38008981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trocar types in laparoscopy.
la Chapelle CF; Swank HA; Wessels ME; Mol BW; Rubinstein SM; Jansen FW
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; (12):CD009814. PubMed ID: 26676093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
