BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31269285)

  • 1. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
    Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups.
    Erdem S; Verep S; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 31794085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
    Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Herlemann A; Buchner A; Kretschmer A; Apfelbeck M; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Tritschler S
    World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 28493044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
    Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Barsky AR; Kraus RD; Carmona R; Santos PMG; Li C; Schwartz LE; Ballas LK; Vapiwala N
    Cancer Med; 2020 May; 9(10):3383-3389. PubMed ID: 32187859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
    Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.
    Ferro M; Lucarelli G; Bruzzese D; Di Lorenzo G; Perdonà S; Autorino R; Cantiello F; La Rocca R; Busetto GM; Cimmino A; Buonerba C; Battaglia M; Damiano R; De Cobelli O; Mirone V; Terracciano D
    Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18424-18434. PubMed ID: 27793023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
    Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
    J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perineural invasion on biopsy is associated with upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
    Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Morash C; Bateman J; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Robertson SJ; Breau RH
    Pathol Int; 2016 Nov; 66(11):629-632. PubMed ID: 27709739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
    Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.