676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31270472)
1. Molecular interactions underlying liquid-liquid phase separation of the FUS low-complexity domain.
Murthy AC; Dignon GL; Kan Y; Zerze GH; Parekh SH; Mittal J; Fawzi NL
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):637-648. PubMed ID: 31270472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Side Chain Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions within Amyloid-like Fibrils Formed by the Low-Complexity Domain of FUS: Evidence from Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Murray DT; Tycko R
Biochemistry; 2020 Feb; 59(4):364-378. PubMed ID: 31895552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrinsically disordered sequences enable modulation of protein phase separation through distributed tyrosine motifs.
Lin Y; Currie SL; Rosen MK
J Biol Chem; 2017 Nov; 292(46):19110-19120. PubMed ID: 28924037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residue-by-Residue View of In Vitro FUS Granules that Bind the C-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II.
Burke KA; Janke AM; Rhine CL; Fawzi NL
Mol Cell; 2015 Oct; 60(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 26455390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. N-terminal acetylation modestly enhances phase separation and reduces aggregation of the low-complexity domain of RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma.
Bock AS; Murthy AC; Tang WS; Jovic N; Shewmaker F; Mittal J; Fawzi NL
Protein Sci; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1337-1349. PubMed ID: 33547841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear Import Receptor Inhibits Phase Separation of FUS through Binding to Multiple Sites.
Yoshizawa T; Ali R; Jiou J; Fung HYJ; Burke KA; Kim SJ; Lin Y; Peeples WB; Saltzberg D; Soniat M; Baumhardt JM; Oldenbourg R; Sali A; Fawzi NL; Rosen MK; Chook YM
Cell; 2018 Apr; 173(3):693-705.e22. PubMed ID: 29677513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular structure and interactions within amyloid-like fibrils formed by a low-complexity protein sequence from FUS.
Lee M; Ghosh U; Thurber KR; Kato M; Tycko R
Nat Commun; 2020 Nov; 11(1):5735. PubMed ID: 33184287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular interactions contributing to FUS SYGQ LC-RGG phase separation and co-partitioning with RNA polymerase II heptads.
Murthy AC; Tang WS; Jovic N; Janke AM; Seo DH; Perdikari TM; Mittal J; Fawzi NL
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):923-935. PubMed ID: 34759379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insights into the Atomistic Mechanisms of Phosphorylation in Disrupting Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Aggregation of the FUS Low-Complexity Domain.
Lao Z; Dong X; Liu X; Li F; Chen Y; Tang Y; Wei G
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(13):3227-3238. PubMed ID: 35709363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time observation of structure and dynamics during the liquid-to-solid transition of FUS LC.
Berkeley RF; Kashefi M; Debelouchina GT
Biophys J; 2021 Apr; 120(7):1276-1287. PubMed ID: 33607084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pressure and Temperature Phase Diagram for Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of the RNA-Binding Protein Fused in Sarcoma.
Li S; Yoshizawa T; Yamazaki R; Fujiwara A; Kameda T; Kitahara R
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jul; 125(25):6821-6829. PubMed ID: 34156864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hsp27 chaperones FUS phase separation under the modulation of stress-induced phosphorylation.
Liu Z; Zhang S; Gu J; Tong Y; Li Y; Gui X; Long H; Wang C; Zhao C; Lu J; He L; Li Y; Liu Z; Li D; Liu C
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):363-372. PubMed ID: 32231288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structure of FUS Protein Fibrils and Its Relevance to Self-Assembly and Phase Separation of Low-Complexity Domains.
Murray DT; Kato M; Lin Y; Thurber KR; Hung I; McKnight SL; Tycko R
Cell; 2017 Oct; 171(3):615-627.e16. PubMed ID: 28942918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conformational fluctuations and phases in fused in sarcoma (FUS) low-complexity domain.
Thirumalai D; Kumar A; Chakraborty D; Straub JE; Mugnai ML
Biopolymers; 2024 Mar; 115(2):e23558. PubMed ID: 37399327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of ATP in solubilizing RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma.
Aida H; Shigeta Y; Harada R
Proteins; 2022 Aug; 90(8):1606-1612. PubMed ID: 35297101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) liquid-liquid phase separation is mediated by just a few aromatic residues.
Li HR; Chiang WC; Chou PC; Wang WJ; Huang JR
J Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 293(16):6090-6098. PubMed ID: 29511089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expansion of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Increases the Range of Stability of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation.
Garaizar A; Sanchez-Burgos I; Collepardo-Guevara R; Espinosa JR
Molecules; 2020 Oct; 25(20):. PubMed ID: 33076213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Molecular Grammar Governing the Driving Forces for Phase Separation of Prion-like RNA Binding Proteins.
Wang J; Choi JM; Holehouse AS; Lee HO; Zhang X; Jahnel M; Maharana S; Lemaitre R; Pozniakovsky A; Drechsel D; Poser I; Pappu RV; Alberti S; Hyman AA
Cell; 2018 Jul; 174(3):688-699.e16. PubMed ID: 29961577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A unified mechanism for LLPS of ALS/FTLD-causing FUS as well as its modulation by ATP and oligonucleic acids.
Kang J; Lim L; Lu Y; Song J
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000327. PubMed ID: 31188823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lipid droplets as substrates for protein phase separation.
Kamatar A; Bravo JPK; Yuan F; Wang L; Lafer EM; Taylor DW; Stachowiak JC; Parekh SH
Biophys J; 2024 Jun; 123(11):1494-1507. PubMed ID: 38462838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
