These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31270654)

  • 61. NLDock: a Fast Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking Algorithm for Modeling RNA/DNA-Ligand Complexes.
    Feng Y; Zhang K; Wu Q; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4771-4782. PubMed ID: 34468128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Lessons from (co-)evolution in the docking of proteins and peptides for CAPRI Rounds 28-35.
    Yu J; Andreani J; Ochsenbein F; Guerois R
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):378-390. PubMed ID: 27701780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Modeling Peptide-Protein Structure and Binding Using Monte Carlo Sampling Approaches: Rosetta FlexPepDock and FlexPepBind.
    Alam N; Schueler-Furman O
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1561():139-169. PubMed ID: 28236237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes.
    Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. MDockPeP: An ab-initio protein-peptide docking server.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Oct; 39(28):2409-2413. PubMed ID: 30368849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Protocols for All-Atom Reconstruction and High-Resolution Refinement of Protein-Peptide Complex Structures.
    Badaczewska-Dawid AE; Khramushin A; Kolinski A; Schueler-Furman O; Kmiecik S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2165():273-287. PubMed ID: 32621231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Novel Consensus Docking Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Ren X; Shi YS; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhang LH; Peng YB; Zeng R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 30044626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A non-redundant protein-RNA docking benchmark version 2.0.
    Nithin C; Mukherjee S; Bahadur RP
    Proteins; 2017 Feb; 85(2):256-267. PubMed ID: 27862282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. PEP-SiteFinder: a tool for the blind identification of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces.
    Saladin A; Rey J; Thévenet P; Zacharias M; Moroy G; Tufféry P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W221-6. PubMed ID: 24803671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Improving Docking Power for Short Peptides Using Random Forest.
    Sanner MF; Dieguez L; Forli S; Lis E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jun; 61(6):3074-3090. PubMed ID: 34124893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Conformational variability in proteins bound to single-stranded DNA: A new benchmark for new docking perspectives.
    Mias-Lucquin D; Chauvot de Beauchene I
    Proteins; 2022 Mar; 90(3):625-631. PubMed ID: 34617336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. SkeleDock: A Web Application for Scaffold Docking in PlayMolecule.
    Varela-Rial A; Majewski M; Cuzzolin A; Martínez-Rosell G; De Fabritiis G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2673-2677. PubMed ID: 32407111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. AnchorDock for Blind Flexible Docking of Peptides to Proteins.
    Slutzki M; Ben-Shimon A; Niv MY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1561():95-108. PubMed ID: 28236235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Virtual fragment docking by Glide: a validation study on 190 protein-fragment complexes.
    Sándor M; Kiss R; Keseru GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 20459088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
    Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; Augustyniak R; Ginalski K
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.