These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31270793)
1. The validity and consistency of continuous joystick response in perceptual decision-making. Szul MJ; Bompas A; Sumner P; Zhang J Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 31270793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson's disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions. Huang YT; Georgiev D; Foltynie T; Limousin P; Speekenbrink M; Jahanshahi M Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():577-87. PubMed ID: 26184442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model. Holmes WR; Trueblood JS; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2016 Mar; 85():1-29. PubMed ID: 26760448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond information rate, the capacity of cognitive control predicts response criteria in perceptual decision-making. Guan Q; Wang J; Chen Y; Liu Y; He H Brain Cogn; 2021 Nov; 154():105788. PubMed ID: 34481205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Two-Stage Process Model of Sensory Discrimination: An Alternative to Drift-Diffusion. Sun P; Landy MS J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(44):11259-11274. PubMed ID: 27807167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls. Peters J; D'Esposito M PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple timescales of learning indicated by changes in evidence-accumulation processes during perceptual decision-making. Cochrane A; Sims CR; Bejjanki VR; Green CS; Bavelier D NPJ Sci Learn; 2023 Jun; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 37291102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality. Gomez P; Ratcliff R; Childers R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 26322685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the benefits of using decision models with response time and accuracy data. Stafford T; Pirrone A; Croucher M; Krystalli A Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2142-2155. PubMed ID: 32232739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vestibular cognition: the effect of prior belief on vestibular perceptual decision making. Ellis AW; Klaus MP; Mast FW J Neurol; 2017 Oct; 264(Suppl 1):74-80. PubMed ID: 28361254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are accuracy and reaction time affected via different processes? Mulder MJ; van Maanen L PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80222. PubMed ID: 24260358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Salience Network and Its Functional Architecture in a Perceptual Decision: An Effective Connectivity Study. Lamichhane B; Dhamala M Brain Connect; 2015 Aug; 5(6):362-70. PubMed ID: 25578366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using mixture modeling to examine differences in perceptual decision-making as a function of the time and method of participant recruitment. Ballard T; Evans NJ; Fisher G; Sewell DK Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2194-2212. PubMed ID: 37466756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition of Pre-Supplementary Motor Area by Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Leads to More Cautious Decision-making and More Efficient Sensory Evidence Integration. Tosun T; Berkay D; Sack AT; Çakmak YÖ; Balcı F J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 29(8):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 28387589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality. Heekeren HR; Marrett S; Ruff DA; Bandettini PA; Ungerleider LG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jun; 103(26):10023-8. PubMed ID: 16785427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study. White CN; Servant M; Logan GD Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):286-301. PubMed ID: 28357629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction. Shankar S; Kayser AS J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2088-2103. PubMed ID: 28250149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding perceptual judgment in autism spectrum disorder using the drift diffusion model. Pirrone A; Dickinson A; Gomez R; Stafford T; Milne E Neuropsychology; 2017 Feb; 31(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 27732040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model. Holmes WR; Trueblood JS Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):730-743. PubMed ID: 28597236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual Hallucinations Are Characterized by Impaired Sensory Evidence Accumulation: Insights From Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling in Parkinson's Disease. O'Callaghan C; Hall JM; Tomassini A; Muller AJ; Walpola IC; Moustafa AA; Shine JM; Lewis SJG Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2017 Nov; 2(8):680-688. PubMed ID: 29560902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]