These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31270888)

  • 1. Reliability and Validity of T-scan and 3D Intraoral Scanning for Measuring the Occlusal Contact Area.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Mariano-Hernandez Y; Khoury-Ribas L; Rovira-Lastra B; Willaert E; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 31270888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo evaluation of T-Scan in quantifying occlusal contact.
    Wang Q; Zhao Z; Li J; Zhao R; Zhou M; Tang K; Bai S; Ma C; Wang F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Sep; 51(9):1675-1683. PubMed ID: 38926933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference values and reliability of occlusal force distribution and occlusal time measured by the T-Scan system in adults with healthy dentition.
    Rubió-Ferrer G; Rovira-Lastra B; Khoury-Ribas L; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; 33(6):558-564. PubMed ID: 38469973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of optical interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner.
    Okamoto M; Tanabe N; Fukazawa S; Oyamada Y; Kondo H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Oct; 67(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 36967125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of intraoral scan and dental cast scan on occlusal quantitative analysis of virtual dental model].
    Cheng MX; Jiang T; Sun YC; Zhang HY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):136-140. PubMed ID: 29483736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of the T-Scan(®) III for measuring force under laboratory conditions.
    Cerna M; Ferreira R; Zaror C; Navarro P; Sandoval P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jul; 42(7):544-51. PubMed ID: 25727489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Virtual Intersection and Occlusal Contacts between Intraoral and Laboratory Scans: An In-Vivo Study.
    Beck F; Lettner S; Zupancic Cepic L; Schedle A
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems.
    Wong KY; Esguerra RJ; Chia VAP; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29160904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial.
    Wei D; Yi X; Lin Y; Di P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Sep; 28(10):543. PubMed ID: 39316184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction of a novel digital method for quantitative analysis of occlusal contact and force.
    Zhao Z; Wang Q; Li J; Zhou M; Tang K; Chen J; Wang F
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):190. PubMed ID: 37005643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different occlusal forces on the accuracy of interocclusal records of loose teeth.
    Lu B; Shao L; Yu Q
    J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 50(7):548-554. PubMed ID: 36959731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance.
    Lepley CR; Throckmorton GS; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):606-13. PubMed ID: 21536203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
    Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of the virtual occlusal record.
    Botsford KP; Frazier MC; Ghoneima AAM; Utreja A; Bhamidipalli SS; Stewart KT
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Sep; 89(5):751-757. PubMed ID: 30920871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo evaluation of the reliability and validity of three digital occlusion analysis methods.
    Wang Q; Zhao Z; Zhou M; Zheng X; An N; Niu L; Tay FR; Ma C; Wang F
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104355. PubMed ID: 36332701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of digital and conventional systems in locating occlusal contacts: A clinical study.
    Rovira-Lastra B; Khoury-Ribas L; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Chaurasia A; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 37612195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength.
    Nishine M; Kobayashi H; Ito K; Wadachi J; Tasaka A; Yamashita S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Aug; 37(4):457-459. PubMed ID: 37273184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.