151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31271504)
1. lilacs search strategy for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Pereira RA; Puga MEDS; Atallah ÁN; Macedo EC; Macedo CR
Health Info Libr J; 2019 Sep; 36(3):223-243. PubMed ID: 31271504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression.
Mann R; Gilbody SM
Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 1():9. PubMed ID: 22588034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Emtree term "diagnostic test accuracy study" retrieved less than half of the diagnostic accuracy studies in Embase.
Gurung P; Makineli S; Spijker R; Leeflang MMG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():116-121. PubMed ID: 32615208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Systematic review of diagnostic tests accuracy: a narrative review].
de Oliveira GM; Camargo FT; Gonçalves EC; Duarte CV; Guimarães CA
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2010 Apr; 37(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 20549106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.
Kastner M; Wilczynski NL; McKibbon AK; Garg AX; Haynes RB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 19230607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.
Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7482):68. PubMed ID: 15619601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
Shojania KG; Bero LA
Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking.
Preston L; Carroll C; Gardois P; Paisley S; Kaltenthaler E
Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():82. PubMed ID: 26113080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance.
Casey M; Raynor M; Jacob C; Sharp S; McFarlane E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):903-912. PubMed ID: 32985071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.
Sampson M; McGowan J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 16980145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A highly sensitive search strategy for clinical trials in Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) was developed.
Manríquez JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 18313567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
van Enst WA; Scholten RJ; Whiting P; Zwinderman AH; Hooft L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1192-9. PubMed ID: 24996667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased workload for systematic review literature searches of diagnostic tests compared with treatments: challenges and opportunities.
Petersen H; Poon J; Poon SK; Loy C
JMIR Med Inform; 2014 May; 2(1):e11. PubMed ID: 25600450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological and users' surveys on the use of the LILACS database in Cochrane reviews identified desirable improvements to the database.
Escobar-Liquitay CM; Vergara-Merino L; Verdejo C; Kirmayr M; Schuller-Martínez B; Madrid E; Meza N; Bracchiglione J; Franco JVA
Health Info Libr J; 2024 Mar; 41(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 37574776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth.
Honest H; Bachmann LM; Khan K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Mar; 107(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12593888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
