These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31271910)

  • 1. Individual differences in higher-level cognitive abilities do not predict overconfidence in complex task performance.
    Visser TAW; Bender AD; Bowden VK; Black SC; Greenwell-Barnden J; Loft S; Lipp OV
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102777. PubMed ID: 31271910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory.
    Uncapher MR; K Thieu M; Wagner AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 26223469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of a training that combines activities on working memory and metacognition: Transfer and maintenance effects in children with ADHD and typical development.
    Capodieci A; Re AM; Fracca A; Borella E; Carretti B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Dec; 41(10):1074-1087. PubMed ID: 31401917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 May; 71():39-58. PubMed ID: 30928898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does cognitive control ability mediate the relationship between reward-related mechanisms, impulsivity, and maladaptive outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood?
    McKewen M; Skippen P; Cooper PS; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Lenroot R; Karayanidis F
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):653-676. PubMed ID: 31119652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On supertaskers and the neural basis of efficient multitasking.
    Medeiros-Ward N; Watson JM; Strayer DL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):876-83. PubMed ID: 25223371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control.
    Robison MK; Gath KI; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):649-663. PubMed ID: 26821933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in parietal and frontal cortex structure predict dissociable capacities for perception and cognitive control.
    Eayrs JO; Lavie N
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116148. PubMed ID: 31476428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.
    Levin DT; Biswas G; Lappin JS; Rushdy M; Seiffert AE
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102781. PubMed ID: 31319238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations between performance-based and self-reported prospective memory, impulsivity and encoding support.
    Gladwin TE; Jewiss M; Banic M; Pereira A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 May; 206():103066. PubMed ID: 32247968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion-related impulsivity moderates the cognitive interference effect of smartphone availability on working memory.
    Canale N; Vieno A; Doro M; Rosa Mineo E; Marino C; Billieux J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18519. PubMed ID: 31811205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
    Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in mixing costs relate to general executive functioning.
    Smith LL; Banich MT; Friedman NP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 29985039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.
    Quiles C; Prouteau A; Verdoux H
    Encephale; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31227210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.