These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Representing how rabbits quack and competitors act: limits on preschoolers' efficient ability to track perspective. Low J; Drummond W; Walmsley A; Wang B Child Dev; 2014; 85(4):1519-34. PubMed ID: 24476382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reaction time profiles of adults' action prediction reveal two mindreading systems. Edwards K; Low J Cognition; 2017 Mar; 160():1-16. PubMed ID: 28024170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Principles of belief acquisition. How we read other minds. Pascarelli MT; Quarona D; Barchiesi G; Riva G; Butterfill SA; Sinigaglia C Conscious Cogn; 2024 Jan; 117():103625. PubMed ID: 38159535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do people automatically track others' beliefs? Evidence from a continuous measure. van der Wel RP; Sebanz N; Knoblich G Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 24216021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Level-2 perspectives computed quickly and spontaneously: Evidence from eight- to 9.5-year-old children. Elekes F; Varga M; Király I Br J Dev Psychol; 2017 Nov; 35(4):609-622. PubMed ID: 28833301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspective tracking in progress: do not disturb. Rubio-Fernández P Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 23948210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks. Marshall J; Gollwitzer A; Santos LR PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194101. PubMed ID: 29566019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Qureshi AW; Apperly IA; Samson D Cognition; 2010 Nov; 117(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 20817158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence against implicit belief processing in a blindfold task. Rothmaler K; Grosse Wiesmann C PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294136. PubMed ID: 37956182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Spontaneous' visual perspective-taking mediated by attention orienting that is voluntary and not reflexive. Gardner MR; Hull Z; Taylor D; Edmonds CJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):1020-1029. PubMed ID: 28303749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mindreading in the balance: adults' mediolateral leaning and anticipatory looking foretell others' action preparation in a false-belief interactive task. Zani G; Butterfill SA; Low J R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191167. PubMed ID: 32218946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription. Back E; Apperly IA Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 20060965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seeing it both ways: Using a double-cuing task to investigate the role of spatial cuing in Level-1 visual perspective-taking. Michael J; Wolf T; Letesson C; Butterfill S; Skewes J; Hohwy J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 29154620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mindreading by body: incorporating mediolateral balance and mouse-tracking measures to examine the motor basis of adults' false-belief tracking. Zani G; Butterfill SA; Low J R Soc Open Sci; 2023 May; 10(5):221212. PubMed ID: 37234504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen. Surtees A; Samson D; Apperly I Cognition; 2016 Mar; 148():97-105. PubMed ID: 26752604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]